• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与普通老年人群相比,预防认知障碍老年人的急诊科就诊和住院情况:关于可避免事件我们了解多少?一项范围综述的结果

Preventing emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations of older adults with cognitive impairment compared with the general senior population: what do we know about avoidable incidents? Results from a scoping review.

作者信息

Gagnon-Roy Mireille, Hami Benyahia, Généreux Mélissa, Veillette Nathalie, Sirois Marie-Josée, Egan Mary, Provencher Véronique

机构信息

École de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Research Centre on Aging, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 17;8(4):e019908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019908.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019908
PMID:29666129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5905733/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Older cognitively impaired adults present a higher risk of hospitalisation and mortality following a visit to the emergency department (ED). Better understanding of avoidable incidents is needed to prevent them and the associated ED presentations in community-dwelling adults. This study aimed to synthetise the actual knowledge concerning these incidents leading this population to ED presentation, as well as possible preventive measures to reduce them.

DESIGN

A scoping review was performed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework.

METHODS

Scientific and grey literature published between 1996 and 2017 were examined in databases (Medline, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Ageline, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations/theses, Evidence-based medecine (EBM) Reviews, Healthstar), online library catalogues, governmental websites and published statistics. Sources discussing avoidable incidents leading to ED presentations were included and then extended to those discussing hospitalisation and mortality due to a lack of sources. Data (type, frequency, severity and circumstances of incidents, preventive measures) was extracted using a thematic chart, then analysed with content analysis.

RESULTS

67 sources were included in this scoping review. Five types of avoidable incidents (falls, burns, transport accidents, harm due to self-negligence and due to wandering) emerged, and all but transport accidents were more frequent in cognitively impaired seniors. Differences regarding circumstances were only reported for burns, as scalding was the most prevalent mechanism of injury for this population compared with flames for the general senior population. Multifactorial interventions and implications of other professionals (eg, pharmacist, firefighters) were reported as potential interventions to reduce avoidable incidents. However, few preventive measures were specifically tested in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary research that screens for cognitive impairment and involves actors (eg, paramedics) to improve our understanding of avoidable incidents leading to ED visits is greatly needed. This knowledge is essential to develop preventive measures tailored to the needs of older cognitively impaired adults.

摘要

目的

认知功能受损的老年人在急诊就诊后住院和死亡风险更高。为预防此类情况及其在社区居住成年人中的相关急诊就诊,需要更好地了解可避免的事件。本研究旨在综合关于导致该人群急诊就诊的这些事件的实际知识,以及减少这些事件的可能预防措施。

设计

根据阿克斯赛和奥马利框架进行了一项范围综述。

方法

在数据库(医学索引数据库、护理及相关健康累积索引、老年医学数据库、Scopus数据库、ProQuest学位论文数据库、循证医学综述、Healthstar数据库)、在线图书馆目录、政府网站和已发布的统计数据中,检索了1996年至2017年期间发表的科学文献和灰色文献。纳入讨论导致急诊就诊的可避免事件的资料来源,然后由于资料来源不足扩展至讨论住院和死亡情况的资料来源。使用主题图表提取数据(事件的类型、频率、严重程度和情况、预防措施),然后进行内容分析。

结果

本范围综述纳入了67个资料来源。出现了五种可避免事件类型(跌倒、烧伤、交通事故、自我疏忽造成的伤害和走失造成的伤害),除交通事故外,所有这些事件在认知功能受损的老年人中更为常见。仅报告了烧伤情况的差异,与一般老年人群因火焰烧伤相比,烫伤是该人群最常见的受伤机制。多因素干预以及其他专业人员(如药剂师、消防员)的作用被报告为减少可避免事件的潜在干预措施。然而,针对该人群专门测试的预防措施很少。

结论

非常需要进行筛查认知功能障碍并让相关人员(如护理人员)参与的初步研究,以增进我们对导致急诊就诊的可避免事件的理解。这些知识对于制定符合认知功能受损老年人需求的预防措施至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d0/5905733/e15cf2ef71a5/bmjopen-2017-019908f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d0/5905733/f048c179a373/bmjopen-2017-019908f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d0/5905733/e15cf2ef71a5/bmjopen-2017-019908f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d0/5905733/f048c179a373/bmjopen-2017-019908f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d0/5905733/e15cf2ef71a5/bmjopen-2017-019908f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Preventing emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations of older adults with cognitive impairment compared with the general senior population: what do we know about avoidable incidents? Results from a scoping review.与普通老年人群相比,预防认知障碍老年人的急诊科就诊和住院情况:关于可避免事件我们了解多少?一项范围综述的结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 17;8(4):e019908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019908.
2
Preventing avoidable incidents leading to a presentation to the emergency department (ED) by older adults with cognitive impairment: protocol for a scoping review.预防认知障碍老年人导致前往急诊科就诊的可避免事件:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 12;6(2):e009818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009818.
3
Identifying facilitators and barriers to integrated and equitable care for community-dwelling older adults with high emergency department use from historically marginalized groups.确定历史上被边缘化群体中,有高急诊就诊率的社区居住的老年患者,实现整合和公平护理的促进因素和障碍。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 19;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01900-y.
4
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Scoping review exploring the impact of hip fracture in older adults with cognitive impairment or dementia.探讨髋部骨折对认知障碍或痴呆老年患者影响的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 27;15(4):e093893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093893.
7
Multifactorial falls prevention programmes for older adults presenting to the emergency department with a fall: systematic review and meta-analysis.多因素跌倒预防计划在老年患者跌倒急诊中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Inj Prev. 2019 Dec;25(6):557-564. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043214. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Emergency Department Care Transitions for Patients With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.急诊科认知障碍患者的就诊流程转接:综述
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e1-1313.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.076. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的预防:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(2):1-78. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
10
The Experience of Families Accompanying a Senior to the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.家属陪同高龄老人到急诊科就诊的体验:范围综述。
J Emerg Nurs. 2023 Jul;49(4):611-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Care Coordination Program for Assisted Living Residents With Dementia: A Qualitative Study.针对患有痴呆症的辅助生活居民的急诊科护理协调项目:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526413. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26413.
2
Program of intensive support in emergency departments for care partners of cognitively impaired patients: A randomized controlled trial.急诊科针对认知障碍患者护理伙伴的强化支持项目:一项随机对照试验。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 May;21(5):e70306. doi: 10.1002/alz.70306.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on emergency department visits among palliative home care recipients: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the Piedmont region, Italy.

本文引用的文献

1
A home-based, carer-enhanced exercise program improves balance and falls efficacy in community-dwelling older people with dementia.一项以家庭为基础、由护理人员强化的运动计划可改善社区痴呆老年人的平衡能力和跌倒效能。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jan;29(1):81-91. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001629. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
2
Prevalence and Detection of Prescription Opioid Misuse and Prescription Opioid Use Disorder Among Emergency Department Patients 50 Years of Age and Older: Performance of the Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire, Patient Version.50岁及以上急诊科患者中处方阿片类药物滥用及处方阿片类药物使用障碍的患病率与检测:患者版处方药使用问卷的性能
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(8):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
2019冠状病毒病对姑息性家庭护理接受者急诊科就诊的影响:意大利皮埃蒙特地区一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Nov 14;16:26323524221136880. doi: 10.1177/26323524221136880. eCollection 2022.
4
Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review.优化痴呆患者的急诊护理实践:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1314.e1-1314.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.024.
5
Predictors and trajectories of ED visits among patients receiving palliative home care services: findings from a time series analysis (2013-2017).接受姑息治疗居家护理服务的患者急诊就诊的预测因素和轨迹:一项时间序列分析研究(2013-2017 年)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 16;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00626-w.
6
Determinants Associated With the Risk of Emergency Department Visits Among Patients Receiving Integrated Home Care Services: A 6-Year Retrospective Observational Study in a Large Italian Region.接受整合家庭护理服务的患者急诊就诊风险的相关决定因素:意大利一大型地区 6 年回顾性观察研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Oct 1;10(10):605-612. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.79.
7
Features of primary care practice influence emergency care-seeking behaviors by caregivers of persons with dementia: A multiple-perspective qualitative study.初级保健实践的特点对痴呆症患者照顾者的急诊寻求行为的影响:一项多视角定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2021 Feb;20(2):613-632. doi: 10.1177/1471301220905233. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Factors Influencing Emergency Care by Persons With Dementia: Stakeholder Perceptions and Unmet Needs.影响痴呆症患者急救的因素:利益相关者的看法和未满足的需求。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):711-718. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15737. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Correlates of cognitive functioning in independent elderly patients discharged home from the emergency department after a minor injury.急诊科轻伤后出院回家的独立老年患者认知功能的相关因素
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1313-22. doi: 10.1017/S104161021600065X. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
4
Paramedics assessing Elders at Risk for Independence Loss (PERIL): Derivation, Reliability and Comparative Effectiveness of a Clinical Prediction Rule.护理人员评估有丧失独立能力风险的老年人(PERIL):一种临床预测规则的推导、可靠性及比较有效性
CJEM. 2016 Mar;18(2):121-32. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.14.
5
Preventing avoidable incidents leading to a presentation to the emergency department (ED) by older adults with cognitive impairment: protocol for a scoping review.预防认知障碍老年人导致前往急诊科就诊的可避免事件:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 12;6(2):e009818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009818.
6
Head Trauma in Elderly Patients: Mechanisms of Injuries and CT Findings.老年患者的头部创伤:损伤机制与CT表现
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;24(6):1045-50. doi: 10.17219/acem/27565.
7
Sources of Potentially Avoidable Emergency Department Visits.潜在可避免的急诊科就诊的来源
Healthc Q. 2014;17(4):82.
8
Return to the ED and hospitalisation following minor injuries among older persons treated in the emergency department: predictors among independent seniors within 6 months.急诊科治疗的老年人轻伤后返回急诊科及住院情况:6个月内独立老年人中的预测因素
Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):624-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv054. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Predicting geriatric falls following an episode of emergency department care: a systematic review.预测急诊科护理后的老年跌倒:一项系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1069-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12488. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Self-report measures of well-being predict incident harm due to self-neglect in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(2):425-30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141671.