Department of Internal Medicine,Yale School of Medicine,New Haven,Connecticut,USA.
Yale Center for Medical Informatics,Yale School of Medicine,New Haven,Connecticut,USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Oct;30(10):1477-1487. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000017. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
ABSTRACTBackground:Longitudinal studies of older adults are characterized by high dropout rates, multimorbid conditions, and multiple medication use, especially proximal to death. We studied the association between multiple medication use and incident dementia diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VD), and Lewy-body dementia (LBD), simultaneously accounting for dropout.
Using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data with three years of follow-up, a set of covariate-adjusted models that ignore dropout was fit to complete-case data, and to the whole-cohort data. Additionally, covariate-adjusted joint models with shared random effects accounting for dropout were fit to the whole-cohort data. Multiple medication use was defined as polypharmacy (⩾ five medications), hyperpolypharmacy (⩾ ten medications), and total number of medications.
Incident diagnoses were 2,032 for AD, 135 for VD, and 139 for LBD. Percentages of dropout at the end of follow-up were as follows: 71.8% for AD, 81.5% for VD, and 77.7% for LBD. The odds ratio (OR) estimate for hyperpolypharmacy among those with LBD versus AD was 2.19 (0.78, 6.15) when estimated using complete-case data and 3.00 (1.66, 5.40) using whole-cohort data. The OR reduced to 1.41 (0.76, 2.64) when estimated from the joint model accounting for dropout. The OR for polypharmacy using complete-case data differed from the estimates using whole-cohort data. The OR for dementia diagnoses on total number of medications was similar, but non-significant when estimated using complete-case data.
Reasons for dropout should be investigated and appropriate statistical methods should be applied to reduce bias in longitudinal studies among high-risk dementia cohorts.
摘要
对老年人进行的纵向研究具有较高的辍学率、多种合并症和多种药物使用的特点,尤其是在接近死亡时。我们研究了多种药物使用与同时考虑辍学的痴呆症诊断(包括阿尔茨海默病[AD]、血管性痴呆[VD]和路易体痴呆[LBD])之间的关联。
使用国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心的数据,随访三年,拟合了一套忽略辍学的协变量调整模型,用于完整病例数据和整个队列数据。此外,还拟合了协变量调整的联合模型,这些模型具有共享随机效应,可考虑辍学情况,适用于整个队列数据。多种药物使用的定义为多药治疗(≥ 5 种药物)、超多药治疗(≥ 10 种药物)和总用药数量。
AD 的发病率为 2032 例,VD 为 135 例,LBD 为 139 例。随访结束时的辍学率如下:AD 为 71.8%,VD 为 81.5%,LBD 为 77.7%。在使用完整病例数据估计时,LBD 与 AD 相比,超多药治疗的优势比(OR)估计值为 2.19(0.78,6.15),而在使用整个队列数据估计时,OR 为 3.00(1.66,5.40)。当从考虑辍学的联合模型中进行估计时,OR 降低至 1.41(0.76,2.64)。使用完整病例数据估计的多药治疗 OR 与使用整个队列数据估计的结果不同。使用完整病例数据估计的痴呆诊断总数药物的 OR 相似,但无统计学意义。
应调查辍学的原因,并应用适当的统计方法,以减少高危痴呆队列的纵向研究中的偏差。