Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiological Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):286-295. doi: 10.1002/jts.22276.
We examined the frequency of trauma types reported in a cohort of service members seeking treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and compared symptom profiles between types. In this observational study, 999 service members (9.2% women; M = 32.91 years; 55.6% White) were evaluated using a standardized assessment procedure to determine eligibility for clinical trials. Participants were evaluated for DSM-IV-TR-defined PTSD using the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview; all participants reported a Criterion A event. Independent evaluators rated descriptions of Criterion A events as belonging to trauma types at a high degree of reliability, κ = 0.80. Aggregated non-life-threat primary trauma types were more frequently endorsed than aggregated life-threat types, 95% CI [17.10%, 29.20%]. Participants who endorsed moral injury-self traumas had a higher level of reexperiencing (d = 0.39), guilt (hindsight bias, d = 1.06; wrongdoing, d = 0.93), and self-blame (d = 0.58) symptoms, relative to those who reported life threat-self. Participants who experienced traumatic loss had greater reexperiencing (d = 0.39), avoidance (d = 0.22), guilt (responsibility, d = 0.39), and greater peri- and posttraumatic sadness (d = 0.84 and d = 0.70, respectively) symptoms, relative to those who endorsed life threat-self. Relative to life threat-self, moral injury-others was associated with greater peri- (d = 0.36) and posttraumatic (d = 0.33) betrayal/humiliation symptoms, and endorsement of aftermath of violence was associated with greater peri- (d = 0.84) and posttraumatic sadness (d = 0.57) symptoms. War zone traumas were heterogeneous, and non-life-threat traumas were associated with distinct symptoms and problems.
我们检查了寻求创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗的军人队列中报告的创伤类型的频率,并比较了不同类型的症状特征。在这项观察性研究中,999 名军人(9.2%为女性;平均年龄 32.91 岁;55.6%为白人)使用标准化评估程序进行评估,以确定参加临床试验的资格。使用 PTSD 症状量表访谈对参与者进行 DSM-IV-TR 定义的 PTSD 评估;所有参与者均报告了符合 A 类事件标准的事件。独立评估员对 A 类事件描述进行评定,认为属于创伤类型的可靠性很高,κ=0.80。非生命威胁主要创伤类型的发生率高于生命威胁类型,95%CI[17.10%,29.20%]。报告道德伤害-自我创伤的参与者在再体验(d=0.39)、内疚(后见之明偏差,d=1.06;不当行为,d=0.93)和自责(d=0.58)方面的症状水平更高,与报告生命威胁-自我的参与者相比。经历创伤性丧失的参与者在再体验(d=0.39)、回避(d=0.22)、内疚(责任,d=0.39)和创伤前后悲伤(d=0.84 和 d=0.70)方面的症状更为严重,与报告生命威胁-自我的参与者相比。与生命威胁-自我相比,道德伤害-他人与更大的创伤前(d=0.36)和创伤后(d=0.33)背叛/羞辱症状相关,而对暴力事件后果的报告与更大的创伤前(d=0.84)和创伤后悲伤(d=0.57)症状相关。战区创伤类型多样,非生命威胁创伤与不同的症状和问题相关。