VA Boston Healthcare System, MA, USA.
Behav Modif. 2012 Nov;36(6):787-807. doi: 10.1177/0145445512446945. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
A common assumption among clinicians and researchers is that war trauma primarily involves fear-based reactions to life-threatening situations. However, the authors believe that there are multiple types of trauma in the military context, each with unique perievent and postevent response patterns. To test this hypothesis, they reviewed structured clinical interviews of 122 active duty service members and assigned the reported index (principal, most currently distressing) events to one or more of the following categories: Life Threat to Self, Life Threat to Others, Aftermath of Violence, Traumatic Loss, Moral Injury by Self, and Moral Injury by Others. They found high interrater reliability for the coding scheme and support for the construct validity of the categorizations. In addition, they discovered that certain categories were related to psychiatric symptoms (e.g., reexperiencing of the traumatic event, guilt, anger) and negative thoughts about the world. Their study provides tentative support for use of these event categories.
一个常见的假设是,临床医生和研究人员认为战争创伤主要涉及对危及生命的情况的基于恐惧的反应。然而,作者认为在军事环境中有多种类型的创伤,每种创伤都有其独特的事件前和事件后反应模式。为了验证这一假设,他们对 122 名现役军人进行了结构化临床访谈,并将报告的主要(当前最困扰的)事件分配到以下一个或多个类别:对自己的生命威胁、对他人的生命威胁、暴力事件的后果、创伤性丧失、自我道德伤害和他人道德伤害。他们发现编码方案的评分者间可靠性很高,并支持分类的结构有效性。此外,他们发现某些类别与精神症状(例如,创伤事件的再体验、内疚、愤怒)和对世界的消极想法有关。他们的研究为使用这些事件类别提供了初步支持。