• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸收性与传统创面敷料的评价。

Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany; Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Germany; Spine Surgery, Schön Klinik Düsseldorf SE & Co. KG, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Mar 30;115(13):213-219. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0213.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0213
PMID:29669676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5938433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower-limb endoprosthetic operations and spinal operations are among the more common types of orthopedic procedures. Postoperative woundhealing disturbances and infections can lead to longer periods of hospital stay and recovery as well as to higher morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

209 patients who had been judged to have an indication for a primary knee or hip endoprosthesis or for a primary spinal operation were included in this randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01988818) over the period June 2014- February 2015. After randomization, patients in the intervention group were given a trial dressing (Mepilex-Border Post-Op) and those in the control group were given a conventional adhesive dressing (Cosmopor). The primary endpoint was blister formation.

RESULTS

In the overall study population, only a single case of blister formation was seen. The affected patient belonged to the intervention group but was mistakenly given a control dressing and developed blisters on the 6th day after surgery. Dressings were changed less frequently in the intervention group, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The patients, nurses, and physicians all expressed greater satisfaction with the trial dressings than with the control dressings (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The intervention group did not differ from the control group with respect to the primary endpoint, postoperative blister formation. The patients, nurses, and physicians all judged the dressing used in the intervention group more favorably than the conventional dressing.

摘要

背景

下肢假体手术和脊柱手术是常见的骨科手术类型之一。术后伤口愈合障碍和感染会导致住院时间和康复时间延长,发病率和死亡率升高。

方法

本随机试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01988818)纳入了 209 名患者,这些患者被认为有进行初次膝关节或髋关节假体手术或初次脊柱手术的指征。在 2014 年 6 月至 2015 年 2 月期间,试验组患者使用试用敷料(Mepilex-Border Post-Op),对照组患者使用常规粘性敷料(Cosmopor)。主要终点为水疱形成。

结果

在总体研究人群中,仅观察到 1 例水疱形成。受影响的患者属于干预组,但错误地使用了对照组的敷料,并在手术后第 6 天出现水疱。干预组的敷料更换频率较低,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。患者、护士和医生均表示试用敷料比对照组敷料更满意(p<0.001)。

结论

干预组与对照组在主要终点即术后水疱形成方面没有差异。患者、护士和医生均认为干预组使用的敷料比常规敷料更优。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing.吸收性与传统创面敷料的评价。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Mar 30;115(13):213-219. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0213.
2
Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较髋关节和膝关节置换术患者伤口敷料的开放标签随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jul 5;19(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2755-8.
3
Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估与标准伤口敷料相比,一种涂有柔软硅胶层的柔性自粘吸收性敷料在骨科或脊柱手术后的性能的临床试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Mar 7;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z.
4
Is the use of modern versus conventional wound dressings warranted after primary knee and hip arthroplasty? Results of a Prospective Comparative Study.初次膝关节和髋关节置换术后使用现代伤口敷料与传统伤口敷料是否合理?一项前瞻性对照研究的结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Dec;81(4):768-75.
5
A prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing two post-operative wound dressings used after elective hip and knee replacement; Mepilex® Border Post-Op versus Aquacel® surgical.一项比较两种择期髋关节和膝关节置换术后使用的两种术后伤口敷料的前瞻性随机对照临床试验:Mepilex® Border Post-Op 与 Aquacel® 外科。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2020 Aug;38:100772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100772. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后新型伤口敷料的比较研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):454-61.
7
Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit.使用现代伤口敷料促进下肢关节置换术后患者康复:一项前瞻性比较审计。
J Wound Care. 2012 Apr;21(4):200-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.4.200.
8
Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus modern surgical dressings following primary total hip and knee replacement.初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术后传统与现代手术敷料的随机对照试验
Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1315-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2726-6. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
9
In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后寻找最佳伤口敷料材料:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3484-4. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Tourniquet Release Prior to Dressing Application Reduces Blistering Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.包扎前松开止血带可减少全膝关节置换术后的水泡形成。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1207-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.035. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective randomized study that compares three different dressings for the prevention of surgical site infections following major heart surgery.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较三种不同敷料对预防心脏大手术后手术部位感染的效果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02533-7.
2
Oncological Surgical Wound Care: A Comparison of Theruptor NXT Non-adherent Dressing and the Current Standard of Care.肿瘤外科伤口护理:Theruptor NXT非粘性敷料与当前护理标准的比较
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56593. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The effect of different wound dressing materials used in postoperative treatment of wounds after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.不同创面敷贴材料用于全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术后创面治疗的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Dec;19(8):2107-2114. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13816. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Could intermittent change of conventional dressing affect risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后常规换药间断改变是否会影响假体周围关节感染的风险?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1681-1687. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04061-1. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
5
In Reply.作为回应。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 22;115(25):428. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0428.
6
Lukewarm Tap Water.温水龙头水。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 22;115(25):427-428. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0427b.
7
Consider the Adhesives of Wound Dressings.考虑伤口敷料的粘合剂。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 22;115(25):427. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0427a.
8
Towards Simpler and Reliable Wound Care.迈向更简单可靠的伤口护理。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Mar 30;115(13):211-212. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0211.

本文引用的文献

1
In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后寻找最佳伤口敷料材料:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3484-4. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Evaluating Skin Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty-What Is the Best Method?一项评估全膝关节置换术后皮肤闭合的Meta分析和系统评价——最佳方法是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2920-2927. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
Postoperative washing of sutured wounds.缝合伤口的术后冲洗
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Sep 2;11:36-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.015. eCollection 2016 Nov.
4
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Sources of Sepsis Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.全关节置换术后脓毒症的发病率、危险因素及来源
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2875-2879.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Microenvironment and microbiology of skin wounds: the role of bacterial biofilms and related factors.皮肤伤口的微环境与微生物学:细菌生物膜及相关因素的作用
Semin Vasc Surg. 2015 Sep-Dec;28(3-4):151-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
A review of blisters caused by wound dressing components: Can they impede post-operative rehabilitation and discharge?伤口敷料成分引起的水泡综述:它们会阻碍术后康复和出院吗?
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2016 May;21:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
7
Postoperative Spine Infections.术后脊柱感染
Asian Spine J. 2016 Feb;10(1):176-83. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.176. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Is the use of modern versus conventional wound dressings warranted after primary knee and hip arthroplasty? Results of a Prospective Comparative Study.初次膝关节和髋关节置换术后使用现代伤口敷料与传统伤口敷料是否合理?一项前瞻性对照研究的结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Dec;81(4):768-75.
9
Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后新型伤口敷料的比较研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):454-61.
10
Role of Surgical Dressings in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.手术敷料在全关节置换术中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Sep;44(9):415-20.