• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较应变和剪切波弹性成像在同一人群中对乳腺肿块的定性和定量评估。

Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Oedae-ro 81, Mohyeon-myeon, Cheoin-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24377-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-24377-0
PMID:29670125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5906688/
Abstract

We investigated addition of strain and shear wave elastography to conventional ultrasonography for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. In all, 108 masses from 94 patients were evaluated with strain and shear wave elastography and scored for suspicion of malignancy, visual score, strain ratio, and elasticity ratio. The diagnostic performance between ultrasonography alone and ultrasonography combined with either type of elastography was compared; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score. Of the 108 masses, 44 were malignant and 64 were benign. The areas under the curves were significantly higher for strain and shear wave elastography-supplemented ultrasonography (0.839 and 0.826, respectively; P = 0.656) than for ultrasonography alone (0.764; P = 0.018 and 0.035, respectively). The diagnostic performances of strain and elasticity ratios were similar when differentiating benign from malignant masses. Cut-off values for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual scores for strain and shear wave elastography were 2.93, 4, 3, and 2, respectively. Both forms of elastography similarly improved the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses.

摘要

我们研究了应变和剪切波弹性成像在常规超声中的应用,以定性和定量评估乳腺肿块;确定了应变比、弹性比和视觉评分的截断值,用于区分良性和恶性肿块。共有 94 例患者的 108 个肿块接受了应变和剪切波弹性成像评估,并对恶性可疑程度进行了评分、视觉评分、应变比和弹性比评分。比较了单独使用超声与联合使用任何一种弹性成像的诊断性能;确定了应变比、弹性比和视觉评分的截断值。在 108 个肿块中,44 个为恶性,64 个为良性。应变和剪切波弹性成像补充超声的曲线下面积明显高于单独超声(分别为 0.839 和 0.826;P=0.656)。应变和弹性比在区分良性和恶性肿块方面的诊断性能相似。应变比、弹性比和应变和剪切波弹性成像的视觉评分的截断值分别为 2.93、4、3 和 2。两种形式的弹性成像均能改善常规超声在定性和定量评估乳腺肿块方面的诊断性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/fb6064538f05/41598_2018_24377_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/d6680960d14e/41598_2018_24377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/00509d99c842/41598_2018_24377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/3b75ae0302fc/41598_2018_24377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/fb6064538f05/41598_2018_24377_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/d6680960d14e/41598_2018_24377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/00509d99c842/41598_2018_24377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/3b75ae0302fc/41598_2018_24377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bd/5906688/fb6064538f05/41598_2018_24377_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population.比较应变和剪切波弹性成像在同一人群中对乳腺肿块的定性和定量评估。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24377-0.
2
Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.通过定量评估比较和联合应用乳腺肿块的应变弹性成像与剪切波弹性成像以鉴别良恶性病变:初步研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):99-109. doi: 10.1002/jum.14309. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.定量剪切波弹性成像在评估实性乳腺肿块中的诊断性能:最具鉴别力参数的确定。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):W328-36. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11693.
4
A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.同时进行应变、剪切波和点剪切波弹性成像的定性和定量评估,以区分良恶性乳腺病变。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Sep;62(9):1155-1162. doi: 10.1177/0284185120961422. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
5
Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.剪切波和应变成像超声弹性成像在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):W347-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10416.
6
Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.弹性成像技术在小乳房肿块中的作用和临床应用价值。
Acad Radiol. 2011 Jan;18(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
7
Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments.对乳腺肿块进行应变和剪切波弹性成像的定性和定量评估,以比较同时进行这两种检查对良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Nov;26(6):792-798. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00985-0. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.乳腺病变中定性和半定量应变弹性成像诊断准确性的比较。
Cancer Imaging. 2016 May 26;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40644-016-0070-8.
9
Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.三维与二维剪切波弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的比较:聚焦于诊断性能
Clin Radiol. 2017 Oct;72(10):878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Does Shear Wave Elastography Score Over Strain Elastography in Breast Masses or Vice Versa?在乳腺肿块中,剪切波弹性成像评分是否优于应变弹性成像,还是相反?
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020 Mar-Apr;49(2):96-101. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Cancer: Unveiling Correlations With Histopathological Grades and Subtypes.乳腺癌中的剪切波弹性成像:揭示与组织病理学分级和亚型的相关性。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 3;16(7):e63759. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63759. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
An improved nomogram including elastography for the prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with 1 or 2 sentinel lymph node metastases.一种改良的列线图,包括弹性成像,用于预测有1或2个前哨淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移情况。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 5;13:1196592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1196592. eCollection 2023.
3
Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.通过定量评估比较和联合应用乳腺肿块的应变弹性成像与剪切波弹性成像以鉴别良恶性病变:初步研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):99-109. doi: 10.1002/jum.14309. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Semi-Quantitative Strain Ratio in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses: Measurements Using One Region-of-Interest.半定量应变率在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的应用:单感兴趣区测量法
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1800-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 May 7.
3
应变弹性成像和剪切波弹性成像在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的诊断价值。
Ann Saudi Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):319-326. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Strain and Shear-Wave Elastography and Their Relationship to Histopathological Features of Canine Mammary Nodular Lesions.应变与剪切波弹性成像及其与犬乳腺结节性病变组织病理学特征的关系。
Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 15;9(9):506. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090506.
5
Extremity compartment syndrome: A review with a focus on non-invasive methods of diagnosis.肢体骨筋膜室综合征:一项聚焦于非侵入性诊断方法的综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 18;10:801586. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.801586. eCollection 2022.
6
Volumetric tri-modal imaging with combined photoacoustic, ultrasound, and shear wave elastography.结合光声、超声和剪切波弹性成像的容积三模态成像。
J Appl Phys. 2022 Jul 21;132(3):034902. doi: 10.1063/5.0093619. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Compression optical coherence elastography versus strain ultrasound elastography for breast cancer detection and differentiation: pilot study.用于乳腺癌检测与鉴别诊断的压迫式光学相干弹性成像与应变超声弹性成像:初步研究
Biomed Opt Express. 2022 Apr 21;13(5):2859-2881. doi: 10.1364/BOE.451059. eCollection 2022 May 1.
8
Multiparametric Intraoperative Ultrasound in Oncological Neurosurgery: A Pictorial Essay.肿瘤神经外科手术中的多参数术中超声:图文综述
Front Neurosci. 2022 Apr 19;16:881661. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.881661. eCollection 2022.
9
Determining the elastography strain ratio cut off value for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.确定弹性成像应变比截断值以区分良恶性乳腺病变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00447-5.
10
Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Skeletal Muscles in Post Stroke Spasticity.定量超声评估中风后痉挛状态下的骨骼肌
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2021 Mar 3;13:1179573521996141. doi: 10.1177/1179573521996141. eCollection 2021.
Shearwave Elastography Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in Characterization of Breast Lesions.
剪切波弹性成像提高了乳腺病变特征描述的诊断准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e3146. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003146.
4
Ultrasonic Elastography Research Based on a Multicenter Study: Adding Strain Ratio after 5-Point Scoring Evaluation or Not.基于多中心研究的超声弹性成像研究:5分评分评估后是否增加应变比
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148330. eCollection 2016.
5
Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?剪切波弹性成像:对于诊断小(≤2厘米)乳腺癌,它是传统超声的一种有价值的辅助方法吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1540. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001540.
6
Clinical value of relative quantification ultrasound elastography in characterizing breast tumors.相对定量超声弹性成像在乳腺肿瘤特征描述中的临床价值。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2015 Oct;75:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
7
Ultrasound Elastography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.超声弹性成像在乳腺癌诊断中的应用
Ultraschall Med. 2015 Dec;36(6):550-62; quiz 563-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553293. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.乳腺肿块的定量最大剪切波弹性作为组织病理严重程度的预测指标。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):448-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13448.
9
Elastography in clinical practice.临床实践中的弹性成像
Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;52(6):1145-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
10
Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography.剪切波弹性成像在乳腺中的应用:质量指标的价值及其与应变弹性成像的比较。
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):45-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132404. Epub 2014 Nov 24.