• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更换帕罗西汀制剂治疗重度抑郁症的比较疗效:一项开放标签多中心研究。

Comparative effectiveness of switching paroxetine formulation for treatment of major depressive disorder: an open-label multicenter study.

作者信息

Otsubo Tempei, Watanabe Yoshinori, Hongo Seiji, Inoue Mikichika, Akimoto Kimiko, Murakami Ken, Takahashi Ryutaro, Kikuchi Toshiaki

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.

Himorogi Psychiatric Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Apr 6;14:955-966. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S152985. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S152985
PMID:29670356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5896672/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the effectiveness and safety of switching the antidepressant formulation from immediate-release (IR) to controlled-release (CR) paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 113 outpatients with MDD diagnosed according to the , Fourth Edition, Text Revision, and treated with a stable dose of IR paroxetine for at least 6 months were enrolled. Patients were then switched to CR paroxetine for 8 weeks. Effectiveness was evaluated by scores on the Himorogi Self-Rating Depression/Anxiety Scales (HSDS/HSAS) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S). Safety was evaluated based on the reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Medication satisfaction and preference were assessed based on questionnaire responses using Likert-type scales.

RESULTS

The overall patient HSDS/HSAS scores significantly improved after switching from IR to CR paroxetine (<0.001). Furthermore, CR paroxetine was superior to IR paroxetine (<0.001) according to the results of the CGI-S evaluation. ADRs were experienced by 14 (12.4%) patients, including dry mouth, nausea/vomiting, somnolence/drowsiness, and wakefulness/arousal during sleep. Satisfaction and preference for paroxetine improved after switching to the CR formulation (<0.001; chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that switching the treatment from IR to CR paroxetine could improve depressive symptoms and decrease ADRs. However, these results may have been caused by the psychological effect of drug switching. Hence, future studies with blinded evaluation methods are required to confirm and expand our findings.

摘要

目的

评估将重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的抗抑郁药物剂型从速释(IR)帕罗西汀转换为控释(CR)帕罗西汀的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

共纳入113例根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版诊断为MDD且用稳定剂量的IR帕罗西汀治疗至少6个月的门诊患者。然后将患者换用CR帕罗西汀治疗8周。通过日高自我评定抑郁/焦虑量表(HSDS/HSAS)评分和临床总体印象 - 严重程度(CGI-S)评估有效性。根据报告的药物不良反应(ADR)评估安全性。使用李克特量表根据问卷回答评估用药满意度和偏好。

结果

从IR帕罗西汀转换为CR帕罗西汀后,患者总体HSDS/HSAS评分显著改善(<0.001)。此外,根据CGI-S评估结果,CR帕罗西汀优于IR帕罗西汀(<0.001)。14例(12.4%)患者出现ADR,包括口干、恶心/呕吐、嗜睡/困倦以及睡眠期间觉醒/兴奋。换用CR剂型后,对帕罗西汀的满意度和偏好有所改善(<0.001;卡方检验)。

结论

这些结果表明,将治疗从IR帕罗西汀转换为CR帕罗西汀可改善抑郁症状并减少ADR。然而,这些结果可能是由药物转换的心理效应引起的。因此,需要未来采用盲法评估方法的研究来证实和扩展我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/a315ecc8e2f0/ndt-14-955Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/d3b6e285f2e5/ndt-14-955Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/9d15b3c543ac/ndt-14-955Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/3eaa6ef61d40/ndt-14-955Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/a315ecc8e2f0/ndt-14-955Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/d3b6e285f2e5/ndt-14-955Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/9d15b3c543ac/ndt-14-955Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/3eaa6ef61d40/ndt-14-955Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/584a/5896672/a315ecc8e2f0/ndt-14-955Fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of switching paroxetine formulation for treatment of major depressive disorder: an open-label multicenter study.更换帕罗西汀制剂治疗重度抑郁症的比较疗效:一项开放标签多中心研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Apr 6;14:955-966. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S152985. eCollection 2018.
2
Safety and effectiveness of controlled-release paroxetine in routine clinical practice: results of a postmarketing surveillance study of patients with depression.在常规临床实践中使用控释帕罗西汀的安全性和有效性:一项针对抑郁症患者的上市后监测研究结果。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Feb 20;11:435-52. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S77542. eCollection 2015.
3
An open-label study of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of switching versus initiating treatment approaches.度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症的开放标签研究:换药与起始治疗方法的比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;25(6):552-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000185429.10053.c8.
4
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
5
Paroxetine controlled release.帕罗西汀控释剂
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):355-64; discussion 365-6. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00003.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of Paroxetine 20 mg daily in the treatment of depression and depression associated anxiety.每日20毫克帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症及伴发焦虑症的疗效与耐受性
J Pak Med Assoc. 2002 Nov;52(11):518-25.
7
Paroxetine : a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of panic disorder.帕罗西汀:在治疗惊恐障碍中的药理学和治疗潜力的综述。
CNS Drugs. 1997 Aug;8(2):163-88. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199708020-00010.
8
The vasopressin V(1b) receptor antagonist SSR149415 in the treatment of major depressive and generalized anxiety disorders: results from 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.加压素 V(1b)受体拮抗剂 SSR149415 治疗重度抑郁和广泛性焦虑障碍:4 项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;73(11):1403-11. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07804. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine in treating major depressive disorder with anxiety symptoms: an 8-week open-label randomised paroxetine-controlled trial.米氮平治疗伴焦虑症状的重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性:8 周开放标签随机帕罗西汀对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;65(3):323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02624.x.
10
History of depressive and anxiety disorders and paroxetine response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: post hoc analysis from a placebo-controlled study.肠易激综合征患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍病史及帕罗西汀反应:一项安慰剂对照研究的事后分析
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(5):368-75. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0504.

本文引用的文献

1
Escitalopram versus paroxetine controlled release in major depressive disorder: a randomized trial.艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀控释剂治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照试验
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jan 6;13:117-125. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S124898. eCollection 2017.
2
Switching the Antidepressant After Nonresponse in Adults With Major Depression: A Systematic Literature Search and Meta-Analysis.成人重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁药治疗无应答后换药:系统文献检索和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r10749.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.
系统评价与Meta分析:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在重度抑郁症中的剂量-反应关系
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 1;173(2):174-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15030331. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Depression and Quality of Life in Older Persons: A Review.老年人的抑郁与生活质量:综述
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;40(5-6):311-39. doi: 10.1159/000437299. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
5
Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials.抗抑郁药的等效剂量:来自随机对照试验的循证推荐
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 15;180:179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Safety and effectiveness of controlled-release paroxetine in routine clinical practice: results of a postmarketing surveillance study of patients with depression.在常规临床实践中使用控释帕罗西汀的安全性和有效性:一项针对抑郁症患者的上市后监测研究结果。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Feb 20;11:435-52. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S77542. eCollection 2015.
7
Examining the relationship between adherence and satisfaction with antidepressant treatment.探讨抗抑郁药物治疗依从性与满意度之间的关系。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Aug 4;10:1433-8. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67008. eCollection 2014.
8
How to compare doses of different antipsychotics: a systematic review of methods.如何比较不同抗精神病药物的剂量:系统评价方法。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Sep;149(1-3):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
9
SSRIs: bad to the bone?选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs):深入骨髓的危害?
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jul;9(7-8):42-7.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antidepressants in primary care: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness model.在初级保健中使用抗抑郁药的效果和成本效益:一项多种治疗比较的荟萃分析和成本效益模型。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042003. Epub 2012 Aug 2.