Sociology Department, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, PO Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jul;47(5):1387-1403. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1194-7. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Individuals who identify as heterosexual but engage in same-sex sexual behavior fascinate both researchers and the media. We analyzed the Online College Social Life Survey dataset of over 24,000 undergraduate students to examine students whose last hookup was with a same-sex partner (N = 383 men and 312 women). The characteristics of a significant minority of these students (12% of men and 25% of women) who labelled their sexual orientation "heterosexual" differed from those who self-identified as "homosexual," "bisexual," or "uncertain." Differences among those who identified as heterosexual included more conservative attitudes, less prior homosexual and more prior heterosexual sexual experience, features of the hookups, and sentiments about the encounter after the fact. Latent class analysis revealed six distinctive "types" of heterosexually identified students whose last hookup was with a same-sex partner. Three types, comprising 60% of students, could be classified as mostly private sexual experimentation among those with little prior same-sex experience, including some who did not enjoy the encounter; the other two types in this group enjoyed the encounter, but differed on drunkenness and desire for a future relationship with their partner. Roughly, 12% could be classified as conforming to a "performative bisexuality" script of women publicly engaging in same-sex hookups at college parties, and the remaining 28% had strong religious practices and/or beliefs that may preclude a non-heterosexual identity, including 7% who exhibited "internalized heterosexism." Results indicate several distinctive motivations for a heterosexual identity among those who hooked up with same-sex partners; previous research focusing on selective "types" excludes many exhibiting this discordance.
个体认同异性恋但从事同性性行为,既引起了研究人员的兴趣,也引起了媒体的关注。我们分析了超过 24000 名本科生的在线大学生社交生活调查数据集,以研究最后与同性伴侣发生性行为的学生(N=383 名男性和 312 名女性)。这些学生中有相当一部分(12%的男性和 25%的女性)将自己的性取向标记为“异性恋”,他们的特征与自我认同为“同性恋”、“双性恋”或“不确定”的学生有所不同。这些认同异性恋的学生之间的差异包括更保守的态度、较少的同性和更多的异性性经验、性行为的特点,以及事后对这次遭遇的看法。潜在类别分析揭示了六类具有异性恋身份且最后与同性发生性行为的学生。这六类中的三类(占学生的 60%)可以归类为那些以前几乎没有同性经验的人进行的私下性实验,包括一些人不喜欢这次遭遇;这一组中的另外两类人喜欢这次遭遇,但在醉酒程度和对与伴侣未来关系的渴望上有所不同。大约 12%的人可以归类为符合女性在大学派对上公开参与同性性行为的“表现型双性恋”脚本,而其余 28%的人则有强烈的宗教实践和/或信仰,可能排除非异性恋身份,包括 7%的人表现出“内化的异性恋主义”。研究结果表明,在与同性发生性关系的人中,有几种不同的认同异性恋的动机;以前的研究只关注选择性的“类型”,忽略了许多表现出这种不一致的人。