Watts G F, Hodgson B, Morris R W, Shaw K M, Polak A
Wessex Regional Renal Unit, Hampshire, UK.
Diabet Med. 1988 Apr;5(3):298-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb00992.x.
Three side-room tests (latex bead immunoagglutination test, LBT; 25% sulphosalicylic acid test, SST; microalbutest, MAT) for the detection of microalbuminuria in diabetics are described and their screening potential and practicability assessed. One hundred insulin-dependent diabetics attending a diabetic clinic provided an early morning urine sample (Albustix-negative) which was subjected to each of the three tests, and urinary albumin concentration (UA) was assayed by RIA. Tests were assessed in random order by two trained operators using a semiquantitative grading scale with 100% concordance between 10 observers. All test results greater than or equal to trace +ve were sufficiently sensitive (sensitivity greater than or equal to 90%) in detecting UA greater than 15 mg/l, but MAT exhibited a significantly reduced specificity (69%) and positive predictive value (58%). For a reference UA greater than 30 mg/l, LBT and SST results greater than or equal to trace +ve and MAT results greater than or equal to +ve showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity greater than 85% and a positive predictive value greater than 60%. Reagent shelf-life was shortest with LBT. SST involved centrifugation or filtration. Technical skill required was highest with LBT and lowest with MAT. Costs were slightly higher with LBT than SST and were not available for MAT.
描述了三种用于检测糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿的床边检测方法(乳胶珠免疫凝集试验,LBT;25%磺基水杨酸试验,SST;微白蛋白试验,MAT),并评估了它们的筛查潜力和实用性。100名在糖尿病诊所就诊的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者提供了晨尿样本(Albustix检测为阴性),对该样本进行了这三种检测,并通过放射免疫分析法测定尿白蛋白浓度(UA)。由两名经过培训的操作人员按照随机顺序使用半定量分级量表对检测进行评估,10名观察者之间的一致性为100%。所有大于或等于微量阳性的检测结果在检测UA大于15mg/l时都具有足够的敏感性(敏感性大于或等于90%),但MAT的特异性(69%)和阳性预测值(58%)显著降低。对于参考UA大于30mg/l,LBT和SST大于或等于微量阳性的结果以及MAT大于或等于阳性的结果显示敏感性为100%,特异性大于85%,阳性预测值大于60%。LBT的试剂保质期最短。SST需要离心或过滤。LBT所需的技术技能最高,MAT所需的技术技能最低。LBT的成本略高于SST,MAT没有成本数据。