• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in Prescription Pain Medication Use by Race/Ethnicity Among US Adults With Noncancer Pain, 2000-2015.美国成年人非癌性疼痛患者中按种族/族裔划分的处方止痛药使用趋势,2000-2015 年。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jun;108(6):788-790. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304349. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Racial/ethnic differences in prescription opioid misuse and heroin use among a national sample, 1999-2018.1999-2018 年全国样本中处方阿片类药物滥用和海洛因使用的种族/民族差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108588. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108588. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
Trends in psychotropic medication use among U.S. adults.美国成年人使用精神药物的趋势。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 May;16(5):560-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.1367.
4
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prevalence Trends for Heroin use and Non-Medical use of Prescription Opioids Among Entrants to Opioid Treatment Programs, 2005-2016.2005 - 2016年阿片类药物治疗项目参与者中使用海洛因及非医疗用途处方阿片类药物的流行趋势的种族/民族差异
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jan 28;53(2):290-300. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1334070. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
Disparities in prescription of opioids among prostate cancer patients of various racial groups.不同种族前列腺癌患者在阿片类药物处方方面的差异。
Pain Manag. 2019 May;9(3):273-281. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0076. Epub 2019 May 30.
6
Is the Prescription Opioid Epidemic a White Problem?处方阿片类药物流行是白人的问题吗?
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2127-2129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303483.
7
Association Between Opioid Prescriptions and Non-US-Born Status in the US.阿片类药物处方与美国非出生状态之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6745.
8
Potentially Problematic Opioid Prescriptions Among Individuals With Private Insurance and Medicaid.私人保险和医疗补助覆盖人群中潜在有问题的阿片类药物处方。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Aug 1;70(8):681-688. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800555. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
Racial inequities in U.S. naloxone prescriptions.美国纳洛酮处方中的种族不平等现象。
Subst Abus. 2020;41(2):232-244. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1686721. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Are there racial disparities in psychotropic drug use and expenditures in a nationally representative sample of men in the United States? Evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.在美国全国代表性的男性样本中,精神药物的使用和支出是否存在种族差异?来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
Am J Mens Health. 2014 Jan;8(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/1557988313496564. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Reported Pain Treatment Practices Among U.S. and Canadian Adults: Findings From a Population Survey.美国和加拿大成年人自我报告的疼痛治疗方法:一项人口调查的结果
Innov Aging. 2023 Sep 16;7(10):igad103. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad103. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in chronic pain after acute traumatic injury.与急性创伤性损伤后慢性疼痛的种族和民族差异相关的因素。
Inj Prev. 2024 Jan 25;30(1):14-19. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044876.
3
Opioid prescriptions among Sami and non-Sami with chronic pain: The SAMINOR 2 Questionnaire Survey and the Norwegian Prescription Database.慢性疼痛的萨米人和非萨米人之间的阿片类药物处方:SAMINOR 2 问卷调查和挪威处方数据库。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023 Dec;82(1):2241202. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2241202.
4
Demographics, Birth Parameters, and Social Determinants of Health Among Opioid-Exposed Mother-Infant Dyads Affected by Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Pennsylvania, 2018-2019.宾夕法尼亚州 2018-2019 年受新生儿戒断综合征影响的阿片类药物暴露母婴对子的人口统计学、出生参数和健康社会决定因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Dec;27(Suppl 1):34-43. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03678-5. Epub 2023 May 27.
5
Sex and Race Differences in the Evaluation and Treatment of Young Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain.性别和种族差异对急诊科胸痛就诊的年轻成年人的评估和治疗的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e024199. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024199. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Editorial: Parenting in the Context of Opioid Use: Mechanisms, Prevention Solutions, and Policy Implications.社论:阿片类药物使用背景下的育儿:机制、预防解决方案及政策影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 2;13:859257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859257. eCollection 2022.
7
Did prescribing laws disproportionately affect opioid dispensing to Black patients?处方法律是否不成比例地影响了黑人患者的阿片类药物配给?
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):482-496. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13968. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
8
Rapid Discontinuation of Chronic, High-Dose Opioid Treatment for Pain: Prevalence and Associated Factors.慢性大剂量阿片类药物治疗疼痛的快速停药:流行情况和相关因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1603-1609. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07119-3. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Patient, Provider, and Clinic Characteristics Associated with Opioid and Non-Opioid Pain Prescriptions for Patients Receiving Low Back Imaging in Primary Care.在初级保健中接受下背痛影像学检查的患者,其与阿片类药物和非阿片类药物处方相关的患者、提供者和诊所特征。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):950-963. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.05.210033.
10
Racial Inequality in Prescription Opioid Receipt - Role of Individual Health Systems.处方阿片类药物使用中的种族不平等——个体医疗系统的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):342-351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2034159.

本文引用的文献

1
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
2
Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.非侵入性治疗急性、亚急性和慢性下背痛:美国医师学院临床实践指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions at Emergency Department Visits for Conditions Commonly Associated with Prescription Drug Abuse.急诊科就诊时因常见于与处方药滥用相关病症的阿片类药物处方中的种族-族裔差异。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):e0159224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159224. eCollection 2016.
4
Racial disparities across provider specialties in opioid prescriptions dispensed to medicaid beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain.在向患有慢性非癌性疼痛的医疗补助受益人群开具阿片类药物处方方面,不同医疗服务专业之间存在种族差异。
Pain Med. 2015 Apr;16(4):633-40. doi: 10.1111/pme.12555. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
5
Navigating complex sample analysis using national survey data.利用国家调查数据进行复杂样本分析。
Nurs Res. 2012 May-Jun;61(3):231-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182533403.
6
Time to take stock: a meta-analysis and systematic review of analgesic treatment disparities for pain in the United States.评估时机:美国镇痛治疗中疼痛差异的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Pain Med. 2012 Feb;13(2):150-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01310.x. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
7
Racial differences in primary care opioid risk reduction strategies.初级保健中阿片类药物减少风险策略的种族差异。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):219-25. doi: 10.1370/afm.1242.
8
Trends in long-term opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.慢性非癌痛长期阿片类药物治疗趋势。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Dec;18(12):1166-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.1833.
9
The medical expenditure panel survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice.医疗支出小组调查:一项支持医疗保健成本研究并为政策与实践提供信息的国家信息资源。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S44-50. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a23e3a.
10
Trends in opioid prescribing by race/ethnicity for patients seeking care in US emergency departments.美国急诊科就诊患者按种族/族裔划分的阿片类药物处方趋势。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 2;299(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.64.

美国成年人非癌性疼痛患者中按种族/族裔划分的处方止痛药使用趋势,2000-2015 年。

Trends in Prescription Pain Medication Use by Race/Ethnicity Among US Adults With Noncancer Pain, 2000-2015.

机构信息

Jordan M. Harrison is with the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, and the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, National Clinical Scholars Program, Philadelphia. Pooja Lagisetty is with the University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, and is also with the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor. Brian D. Sites is with the Department of Anesthesiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH. Cui Guo is with University of Michigan School of Public Health, Biostatistics Graduate Program, Ann Arbor. Matthew A. Davis is with the University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, and the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2018 Jun;108(6):788-790. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304349. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304349
PMID:29672145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine national trends in the use of various pharmacological pain medication classes by race/ethnicity among the US pain population.

METHODS

We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to conduct a nationally representative, serial cross-sectional study of the noninstitutionalized US adult population from 2000 to 2015. We identified adults with moderate or severe self-reported pain and excluded individuals with cancer. We used complex survey design to provide national estimates of the percentage of adults with noncancer pain who received prescription pain medications among 4 groups: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic or Latino, and other.

RESULTS

The age- and gender-adjusted percentage of prescription opioid use increased across all groups, with the greatest increase among non-Hispanic White individuals. By 2015, the percentage of non-Hispanic Black adults using opioids approximated that of non-Hispanic White adults-in 2015, approximately 23% of adults in these 2 groups used opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of a narrowing divide in opioid prescribing by race. However, in the context of the national epidemic of opioid-related addiction and mortality, opioid-related risks do not appear commensurate with the purported benefits.

摘要

目的

考察美国疼痛人群中不同种族/族裔使用各种药理类止痛药的全国趋势。

方法

我们使用医疗支出调查数据,对 2000 年至 2015 年期间非住院的美国成年人口进行了全国代表性的连续横断面研究。我们确定了有中度或重度自我报告疼痛的成年人,并排除了患有癌症的个体。我们使用复杂的调查设计,在 4 个群体中提供了有非癌症疼痛的成年人接受处方止痛药的百分比的全国估计数:非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔,以及其他。

结果

在所有群体中,年龄和性别调整后的阿片类药物使用率都有所增加,其中非西班牙裔白人的增幅最大。到 2015 年,使用阿片类药物的非西班牙裔黑人成年人的比例已接近非西班牙裔白人成年人-在 2015 年,这两个群体中约有 23%的成年人使用阿片类药物。

结论

据我们所知,这是首次有证据表明种族间阿片类药物处方的差距正在缩小。然而,在全国阿片类药物相关成瘾和死亡的流行背景下,阿片类药物相关风险似乎与所谓的益处不成比例。