University Research Co., LLC, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America.
USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST) Project, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0195691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195691. eCollection 2018.
Uganda is working to increase voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) to prevent HIV infection. To support VMMC quality improvement, this study compared three methods of disseminating information to facilities on how to improve VMMC quality: M-providing a written manual; MH-providing the manual plus a handover meeting in which clinicians shared advice on implementing key changes and participated in group discussion; and MHC-manual, handover meeting, and three site visits to the facility in which a coach provided individualized guidance and mentoring on improvement. We determined the different effects these had on compliance with indicators of quality of care.
This controlled pre-post intervention study randomized health facility groups to receive M, MH, or MHC. Observations of VMMCs performance determined compliance with quality indicators. Intervention costs per patient receiving VMMC were used in a decision-tree cost-effectiveness model to calculate the incremental cost per additional patient treated to compliance with indicators of informed consent, history taking, anesthesia administration, and post-operative instructions.
The most intensive method (MHC) cost $28.83 per patient and produced the biggest gains in history taking (35% improvement), anesthesia administration (20% improvement), and post-operative instructions (37% improvement). The least intensive method (M; $1.13 per patient) was most efficient because it produced small gains for a very low cost. The handover meeting (MH) was the most expensive among the three interventions but did not have a corresponding positive effect on quality.
Health workers in facilities that received the VMMC improvement manual and participated in the handover meeting and coaching visits showed more improvement in VMMC quality indicators than those in the other two intervention groups. Providing the manual alone cost the least but was also the least effective in achieving improvements. The MHC intervention is recommended for broader implementation to improve VMMC quality in Uganda.
乌干达正在努力增加自愿男性包皮环切术(VMMC)以预防艾滋病毒感染。为了支持 VMMC 质量改进,本研究比较了向医疗机构传播有关如何提高 VMMC 质量的三种信息传播方法:M-提供书面手册;MH-提供手册加交接会议,临床医生在会议上分享实施关键变更的建议,并参与小组讨论;以及 MHC-手册、交接会议和三次现场访问,其中教练提供关于改进的个性化指导和指导。我们确定了这些方法对遵守护理质量指标的不同影响。
这项对照前后干预研究将卫生机构组随机分配接受 M、MH 或 MHC。VMMC 表现的观察确定了对质量指标的遵守情况。接受 VMMC 的每位患者的干预成本用于决策树成本效益模型,以计算为达到知情同意、病史采集、麻醉管理和术后指导指标的每位额外治疗患者的增量成本。
最密集的方法(MHC)每位患者成本为 28.83 美元,在病史采集(提高 35%)、麻醉管理(提高 20%)和术后指导(提高 37%)方面取得了最大的收益。最不密集的方法(M;每位患者 1.13 美元)最有效,因为它的成本非常低,收益却很小。交接会议(MH)是三种干预措施中最昂贵的,但对质量没有相应的积极影响。
接受 VMMC 改进手册并参加交接会议和辅导访问的医疗机构卫生工作者在 VMMC 质量指标方面的改进比其他两个干预组更多。单独提供手册的成本最低,但在实现改进方面效果最差。MHC 干预措施建议更广泛地实施,以提高乌干达 VMMC 的质量。