Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science and Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):38-54. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00317. Print 2020 Mar 30.
Coaching can improve the quality of care in primary-level birth facilities and promote birth attendant adherence to essential birth practices (EBPs) that reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. The intensity of coaching needed to promote and sustain behavior change is unknown. We investigated the relationship between coaching intensity, EBP adherence, and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using data from the BetterBirth Trial, which assessed the impact of a complex, coaching-based implementation of the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist in Uttar Pradesh, India.
For each birth, we defined multiple coaching intensity metrics, including coaching frequency (coaching visits per month), cumulative coaching (total coaching visits accrued during the intervention), and scheduling adherence (coaching delivered as scheduled). We considered coaching delivered at both facility and birth attendant levels. We assessed the association between coaching intensity and birth attendant adherence to 18 EBPs and with maternal and perinatal health outcomes using regression models.
Coaching frequency was associated with modestly increased EBP adherence. Delivering 6 coaching visits per month to facilities was associated with adherence to 1.3 additional EBPs (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.6, 1.9). High-frequency coaching delivered with high coverage among birth attendants was associated with greater improvements: providing 70% of birth attendants at a facility with at least 1 visit per month was associated with adherence to 2.0 additional EBPs (95% CI=1.0, 2.9). Neither cumulative coaching nor scheduling adherence was associated with EBP adherence. Coaching was generally not associated with health outcomes, possibly due to the small magnitude of association between coaching and EBP adherence.
Frequent coaching may promote behavior change, especially if delivered with high coverage among birth attendants. However, the effects of coaching were modest and did not persist over time, suggesting that future coaching-based interventions should explore providing frequent coaching for longer periods.
辅导可以提高基层生育机构的护理质量,并促进助产士遵守减少孕产妇和围产儿死亡的基本生育实践(EBP)。促进和维持行为改变所需的辅导强度尚不清楚。我们使用来自 BetterBirth 试验的数据研究了辅导强度、EBP 依从性与母婴健康结局之间的关系,该试验评估了在印度北方邦实施基于辅导的复杂世界卫生组织安全分娩清单对母婴健康结局的影响。
对于每一次分娩,我们定义了多个辅导强度指标,包括辅导频率(每月辅导次数)、累计辅导(干预期间累计的总辅导次数)和调度依从性(按计划提供辅导)。我们考虑了在设施和助产士两个层面提供的辅导。我们使用回归模型评估辅导强度与助产士遵守 18 项 EBP 的关系,以及与母婴健康结局的关系。
辅导频率与 EBP 依从性略有增加相关。每月向设施提供 6 次辅导与遵守 1.3 项额外的 EBP 相关(95%置信区间[CI]=0.6, 1.9)。在高覆盖率的助产士中高频提供辅导与更大的改进相关:为设施中 70%的助产士提供至少每月一次的访问与遵守 2.0 项额外的 EBP 相关(95%CI=1.0, 2.9)。累计辅导和调度依从性均与 EBP 依从性无关。辅导通常与健康结果无关,这可能是由于辅导与 EBP 依从性之间的关联幅度较小。
频繁的辅导可能会促进行为改变,尤其是在高覆盖率的助产士中提供时。然而,辅导的效果是适度的,并没有随着时间的推移而持续,这表明未来基于辅导的干预措施应该探索提供更长时间的频繁辅导。