Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1461-1476. doi: 10.1111/add.14188. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
To estimate whether opioid substitution treatment (OST) with buprenorphine or methadone is associated with a greater reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and opioid drug-related poisoning (DRP) mortality.
Cohort study with linkage between clinical records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and mortality register.
UK primary care.
A total of 11 033 opioid-dependent patients who received OST from 1998 to 2014, followed-up for 30 410 person-years.
Exposure to methadone (17 373, 61%) OST episodes or buprenorphine (9173, 39%) OST episodes. ACM was available for all patients; information on cause of death and DRP was available for 5935 patients (54%) followed-up for 16 363 person-years. Poisson regression modelled mortality by treatment period with an interaction between OST type and treatment period (first 4 weeks on OST, rest of time off OST, first 4 weeks off OST, rest of time out of OST censored at 12 months) to test whether ACM or DRP differed between methadone and buprenorphine. Inverse probability weights were included to adjust for confounding and balance characteristics of patients prescribed methadone or buprenorphine.
ACM and DRP rates were 1.93 and 0.53 per 100 person-years, respectively. DRP was elevated during the first 4 weeks of OST [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.93 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-3.82], the first 4 weeks off OST (IRR = 8.15, 95% CI = 5.45-12.19) and the rest of time out of OST (IRR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.47-3.09) compared with mortality risk from 4 weeks to end of treatment. Patients on buprenorphine compared with methadone had lower ACM rates in each treatment period. After adjustment, there was evidence of a lower DRP risk for patients on buprenorphine compared with methadone at treatment initiation (IRR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01-0.48) and rest of time on treatment (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.79). Treatment duration (mean and median) was shorter on buprenorphine than methadone (173 and 40 versus 363 and 111, respectively). Model estimates suggest that there was a low probability that methadone or buprenorphine reduced the number of DRP in the population: 28 and 21%, respectively.
In UK general medical practice, opioid substitution treatment with buprenorphine is associated with a lower risk of all-cause and drug-related poisoning mortality than methadone. In the population, buprenorphine is unlikely to give greater overall protection because of the relatively shorter duration of treatment.
评估丁丙诺啡或美沙酮替代治疗(OST)是否与全因死亡率(ACM)和阿片类药物相关中毒死亡率(DRP)风险降低相关。
临床实践研究数据链接和死亡率登记处之间的临床记录链接的队列研究。
英国初级保健。
共有 11033 名 1998 年至 2014 年接受 OST 的阿片类药物依赖患者,随访 30410 人年。
暴露于美沙酮(17373 例,61%)OST 发作或丁丙诺啡(9173 例,39%)OST 发作。所有患者均可获得 ACM;5935 例(54%)患者可获得死因和 DRP 信息,随访 16363 人年。泊松回归模型通过治疗期的死亡率进行建模,治疗期之间存在 OST 类型和治疗期之间的相互作用(OST 治疗的前 4 周,其余时间不接受 OST,OST 治疗的前 4 周,其余时间不接受 OST,其余时间不接受 OST 到 12 个月时截止),以测试美沙酮和丁丙诺啡之间的 ACM 或 DRP 是否存在差异。纳入逆概率权重以调整混杂因素并平衡美沙酮或丁丙诺啡处方患者的特征。
ACM 和 DRP 发生率分别为每 100 人年 1.93 和 0.53。OST 的前 4 周(发病率比 [IRR] = 1.93,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.97-3.82)、OST 治疗结束前的前 4 周(IRR = 8.15,95%CI = 5.45-12.19)和其余时间(IRR = 2.13,95%CI = 1.47-3.09)的死亡率风险升高。与每个治疗期的 ACM 相比,丁丙诺啡患者的 ACM 发生率较低。调整后,丁丙诺啡患者的 DRP 风险证据低于美沙酮,起始治疗时(IRR = 0.08,95%CI = 0.01-0.48)和其余时间治疗(IRR = 0.37,95%CI = 0.17-0.79)。丁丙诺啡的治疗持续时间(平均值和中位数)短于美沙酮(分别为 173 天和 40 天与 363 天和 111 天)。模型估计表明,美沙酮或丁丙诺啡在人群中降低 DRP 数量的可能性较低:分别为 28%和 21%。
在英国普通医疗实践中,丁丙诺啡替代治疗与美沙酮相比,全因和药物相关中毒死亡率的风险降低。在人群中,由于治疗时间相对较短,丁丙诺啡不太可能提供更大的总体保护。