Suppr超能文献

来那度胺对比来那度胺+地塞米松二线诱导后延长疗程治疗多发性骨髓瘤:来那度胺+地塞米松。

Lenalidomide versus lenalidomide + dexamethasone prolonged treatment after second-line lenalidomide + dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Internal Medicine, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2256-2268. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1422. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Abstract

Lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). It is possible that single-agent Len may be effective as prolonged treatment regimen in RRMM once patients demonstrate an initial response to Len+Dex induction. Patients with RRMM who responded to first-line Len+Dex in an observational study (NCT01430546) received up to 24 cycles of either Len (25 mg/day) or Len+Dex (25 mg/day and 40 mg/week) as prolonged treatment in a subsequent phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01450215). In the observational study (N = 133), median time to response was 1.7 (range 0.6-9.6) months. A complete response to all treatments received in both studies was observed in 11% of patients; very good partial response and partial response rates were 31% and 38%, respectively. Corresponding response rates in the subgroup of patients who did not enter the phase 2 trial (n = 71) were 3%, 18%, and 39%, respectively. Rates of disease progression at 2 years in the phase 2 trial were 47% versus 31% for Len versus Len+Dex (P = 0.14). After 36 months median follow-up in surviving patients, median time to progression was not reached with Len+Dex and was 24.9 months (95% confidence interval 12.5-not calculable, P < 0.001) with Len. Three-year OS among the total observational study population was 61% (95% CI, 52-69%). The corresponding rate among patients who entered the phase 2 clinical trial was 73% (95% CI, 60-83%) and was significantly lower among those patients who achieved ≥PR but did not proceed into the phase 2 trial (55%; P = 0.01). In the phase 2 trial, OS was 73% in both treatment arms (P = 0.70). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with prolonged (phase 2 trial) versus short-term (observational study) Len administration but remained manageable. Prolonged treatment with Len with or without Dex provides sustained, clinically relevant responses and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile.

摘要

来那度胺(Len)联合地塞米松(Dex)获批用于治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。对于 RRMM 患者,在接受 Len+Dex 诱导治疗后,如果最初有应答,那么单独使用来那度胺进行延长治疗可能是有效的。在一项观察性研究(NCT01430546)中,接受一线 Len+Dex 治疗后有应答的 RRMM 患者在随后的 2 期临床试验(NCT01450215)中接受了长达 24 个周期的 Len(25mg/天)或 Len+Dex(25mg/天和 40mg/周)作为延长治疗。在观察性研究(N=133)中,中位至应答时间为 1.7 个月(范围 0.6-9.6)。所有治疗均有应答的完全缓解率为 11%;非常好的部分缓解和部分缓解率分别为 31%和 38%。未进入 2 期试验的患者亚组(n=71)的相应缓解率分别为 3%、18%和 39%。2 期试验中,Len 和 Len+Dex 的 2 年疾病进展率分别为 47%和 31%(P=0.14)。在生存患者的 36 个月中位随访后,Len+Dex 组无进展时间未达到,为 24.9 个月(95%置信区间 12.5-不可计算,P<0.001);Len 组为 24.9 个月(95%置信区间 12.5-不可计算,P<0.001)。在整个观察性研究人群中,3 年 OS 为 61%(95%CI,52-69%)。进入 2 期临床试验的患者的相应比率为 73%(95%CI,60-83%),而在获得≥部分缓解但未进入 2 期试验的患者中,该比率显著降低(55%;P=0.01)。在 2 期试验中,两个治疗组的 OS 率均为 73%(P=0.70)。与短期(观察性研究)相比,延长(2 期试验)Len 治疗时中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症更为常见,但仍可管理。Len 联合或不联合 Dex 的延长治疗可提供持续、有临床意义的应答,并显示出可接受的安全性特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/6010717/7fd8e64162d0/CAM4-7-2256-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验