Tan Tran-Der, Hong Ying-Chung, Li Sin-Syue, Yu Jui-Ting, Sung Yung-Chuan, Wang Po-Nan, Teng Chieh-Lin Jerry
Hematology and Medical Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chin J Physiol. 2020 Sep-Oct;63(5):211-217. doi: 10.4103/CJP.CJP_68_20.
Lenalidomide with dexamethasone (Len/Dex) is considered to be an effective and well-tolerated regimen to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients relapsing after bortezomib induction therapy. With the increase in novel agents targeting refractory and relapsed MM, the identification of clinical or laboratory variables that can predict the appropriate candidates of Len/Dex is essential. To address this question, we prospectively assessed 38 adult MM patients who received bortezomib-based induction therapy and were administered Len/Dex for their first relapse. These 38 patients were stratified into the symptomatic relapse group (n = 10) and biological relapse group (n = 28) according to the disease status when Len/Dex was initiated. The overall response rate in the symptomatic group and biological relapse group was 70.0% (7/10) and 60.7% (17/28), respectively (P = 0.964). These two groups harbored a comparable median Len/Dex treatment duration (139 vs. 225 days; P = 0.876) and progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) (501 vs. 1289 days; P = 0.410). Multivariate analyses failed to show that treating biological relapse (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-3.88; P = 0.648), PFS with bortezomib-based induction therapies ≥18 months (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.64-5.01; P = 0.266), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 0.56-8.55; P = 0.262), and high-risk cytogenetics (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.18-3.93; P = 0.835) were attributed to depth of Len/Dex treatment. In conclusion, whether MM patients treated by Len/Dex for biological relapse would have a better outcome than those prescribed for symptomatic relapse remains inconclusive. Treating significant biological relapse and symptomatic relapse remains the current consensus.
来那度胺联合地塞米松(Len/Dex)被认为是治疗硼替佐米诱导治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的一种有效且耐受性良好的方案。随着针对难治性和复发性MM的新型药物的增加,识别能够预测Len/Dex合适候选者的临床或实验室变量至关重要。为了解决这个问题,我们前瞻性评估了38例接受基于硼替佐米的诱导治疗且首次复发时接受Len/Dex治疗的成年MM患者。根据开始使用Len/Dex时的疾病状态,将这38例患者分为有症状复发组(n = 10)和生物学复发组(n = 28)。有症状组和生物学复发组的总缓解率分别为70.0%(7/10)和60.7%(17/28)(P = 0.964)。这两组的Len/Dex治疗持续时间中位数相当(139天对225天;P = 0.876),无进展生存期2(PFS2)也相当(501天对1289天;P = 0.410)。多变量分析未能表明治疗生物学复发(风险比[HR]:1.29;95%置信区间[CI]:0.43 - 3.88;P = 0.648)、基于硼替佐米的诱导治疗的PFS≥18个月(HR:1.79;95%CI:0.64 - 5.01;P = 0.266)、自体造血干细胞移植(HR:2.18;95%CI:0.56 - 8.55;P = 0.262)以及高危细胞遗传学(HR:0.85;95%CI:0.18 - 3.93;P = 0.835)与Len/Dex治疗深度有关。总之,对于生物学复发的MM患者,接受Len/Dex治疗是否会比有症状复发的患者有更好的结局仍无定论。治疗显著的生物学复发和有症状复发仍然是当前的共识