1 Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
2 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Jun;25(3):313-319. doi: 10.1177/1526602818771345. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
To report a retrospective analysis of risk factors for edge restenosis after Viabahn stent-graft treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease and determine any protective effect of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) used at the time of stent-graft implantation.
Between October 2011 and July 2016, 110 patients (mean age 73.3±7.6 years; 78 men) were treated with the Viabahn stent-graft for long SFA occlusions. Thirty-eight (34.5%) patients had DCB reinforcement at the distal edge of the stent-graft. For analysis, the population was divided into groups of no edge stenosis patients (n=88; mean lesion length 22.4±4.2 cm) and edge stenosis patients (n=22; mean lesion length 23.5±5.7 cm). The clinical outcomes, ankle-brachial indices, computed tomography angiography findings, and patency were compared at a minimum of 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine risk factors for edge stenosis; the results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval.
No differences in clinical or procedural characteristics were identified except the higher incidence of diabetes (p=0.008) and greater need for retrograde access (p=0.033) in the edge stenosis group. DCB reinforcement reduced the incidence of edge stenosis (p=0.021) and target lesion revascularization (TLR; p=0.010) and resulted in a significantly higher 1-year primary patency rate (92.1% vs 76.4%, p=0.042). However, multivariate analysis revealed only poor distal runoff (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.83, p=0.020) as a predictor of edge stenosis.
The risk of edge stenosis after Viabahn implantation was higher in patients with poor distal runoff. DCB reinforcement over the distal edge reduced edge stenosis, decreased 1-year TLR, and improved 1-year primary patency.
报告 Viabahn 支架移植物治疗股浅动脉(SFA)闭塞性疾病后边缘再狭窄的危险因素分析,并确定支架移植物植入时使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)的任何保护作用。
2011 年 10 月至 2016 年 7 月,110 例(平均年龄 73.3±7.6 岁;78 例男性)采用 Viabahn 支架移植物治疗长段 SFA 闭塞。38 例(34.5%)患者在支架移植物远端边缘行 DCB 强化。为了分析,将人群分为无边缘狭窄组(n=88;平均病变长度 22.4±4.2 cm)和边缘狭窄组(n=22;平均病变长度 23.5±5.7 cm)。比较两组患者至少 12 个月的临床转归、踝肱指数、计算机断层血管造影(CTA)结果和通畅率。采用 logistic 回归分析确定边缘狭窄的危险因素;结果以比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。
两组患者的临床或手术特征无差异,除边缘狭窄组糖尿病发生率较高(p=0.008)和逆行入路需求较大(p=0.033)外。DCB 强化可降低边缘狭窄发生率(p=0.021)和靶病变血运重建率(TLR;p=0.010),并显著提高 1 年原发性通畅率(92.1%比 76.4%,p=0.042)。然而,多变量分析显示,只有较差的远端流出道(OR 0.31,95%CI 0.11 至 0.83,p=0.020)是边缘狭窄的预测因素。
Viabahn 植入后边缘狭窄的风险在远端流出道较差的患者中更高。支架移植物远端边缘行 DCB 强化可减少边缘狭窄,降低 1 年 TLR 发生率,并提高 1 年原发性通畅率。