Department of Radiology, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Germany.
Center for Diagnostic Radiology & Minimally Invasive Therapy, The Jewish Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):276-286. doi: 10.1177/1526602820907917. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
To investigate the efficacy and sustainability of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). An investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized study enrolled 88 patients for treatment of ISR with DCB (n=47; mean age 68.3±9.6 years; 26 men) or uncoated balloon (n=41; mean age 67.6±10.2 years; 26 men) angioplasty ( identifier NCT01594684). Additionally, the protocol provided for an observational arm composed of patients from either randomized arm who experienced recurrent ISR ≥30 days after the index treatment. Redo treatment consisted of 2 DCBs sequentially inflated at the same location (double dose therapy). The majority of patients (66, 78%) had Rutherford category 3 ischemia. The mean lesion length was 140 mm; a third (27, 31%) were total occlusions. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months evaluated by an independent core laboratory. Twenty-two patients (7 DCB +15 uncoated) were treated for recurrence with fully overlapping double DCB angioplasty. Six-month LLL was lower after DCB (0.34±1.12 mm) treatment than after angioplasty with an uncoated balloon (1.58±1.10 mm, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 18 (49%) of 37 patients in the uncoated group, 6 (14%) of 43 patients in the single-dose DCB group (p=0.001), and no patients from the recurrent ISR group. At ~2 years after treatment, a remarkable number (14/27, 52%) of TLRs were recorded in the single-dose DCB group. Treatment with DCBs resulted in significantly less 6-month LLL and fewer TLRs up to 24 months than treatment with uncoated balloons. The double dose for treating recurrent ISR did not cause recognizable adverse events or require TLR up to 24 months.
为了研究药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗股腘段支架内再狭窄(ISR)的疗效和可持续性。一项由研究者发起的前瞻性、多中心、1:1 随机研究纳入了 88 例接受 DCB(n=47;平均年龄 68.3±9.6 岁;26 名男性)或未涂层球囊(n=41;平均年龄 67.6±10.2 岁;26 名男性)血管成形术治疗 ISR 的患者。此外,该方案还规定了一个观察臂,由来自随机治疗组中任何一个组的、在指数治疗后 30 天内发生再发 ISR 的患者组成。再次治疗包括在同一部位依次扩张 2 个 DCB(双倍剂量治疗)。大多数患者(66 例,78%)存在 Rutherford 3 级缺血。平均病变长度为 140mm;其中三分之一(27 例,31%)为完全闭塞。主要终点是由独立核心实验室评估的 6 个月时的血管造影晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。22 例患者(7 例 DCB+15 例未涂层)接受完全重叠的双 DCB 血管成形术治疗复发。与未涂层球囊血管成形术(1.58±1.10mm,p<0.001)相比,DCB 治疗后 6 个月的 LLL 更低。在 12 个月的随访中,未涂层组 37 例患者中有 18 例(49%)进行了目标病变血运重建(TLR),单剂量 DCB 组 43 例患者中有 6 例(14%)(p=0.001),而复发性 ISR 组没有患者进行 TLR。在治疗后约 2 年时,单剂量 DCB 组有 14 例(27%)记录了显著数量的 TLR。与未涂层球囊相比,DCB 治疗在 6 个月时显著降低 LLL,在 24 个月时显著降低 TLR。治疗复发性 ISR 的双倍剂量在 24 个月内未引起可识别的不良事件或需要 TLR。