Suppr超能文献

一项病例对照研究,旨在比较两种微创手术——超小切口子宫肌瘤剔除术和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术——治疗女性患者的效果。

A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.

作者信息

Wen Kuo-Chang, Sung Pi-Lin, Chang Wen-Hsun, Horng Huann-Cheng, Chen Yi-Jen, Lee Wen-Ling, Wang Peng-Hui

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;57(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.02.016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy (UMLT-M with less 4 cm transverse skin incision) and conventional 3-port wound laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) approaches were proposed as alternative minimally invasive procedures in the management of women with symptomatic uterine myomas but few studies have compared the outcomes of both procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2003, 71 patients undergoing UMLT-M were compared with those 71 women undergoing LM. The last data collection for all patients was done on 31 December 2016. The parameters for comparison included the characteristics of the uterine myomas, surgical parameters, morbidities, and outcomes. Surgical parameters included the operative time (minutes), estimated blood loss (milliliters), time for removal of drainage, percentage of blood transfusion and co-morbidities.

RESULTS

Mean operative time in the LM group was significantly longer than that in the UMLT-M group (208.7 ± 65.9 vs. 98.0 ± 28.2 min, p < 0.001). Intra-operative blood loss was significantly higher in the LM group than that in the UMLT-M group (210.9 ± 184.5 vs. 111.7 ± 108.4 ml, p < 0.001). However, more patients had postoperative fever in the UMLT-M group (39.4% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.001). The recurrence rate of myoma at 5-year follow-up was significantly different between two groups (35.2% of UMLT-M vs. 57.7% of LM, p = 0.007), but there was no difference when follow-up time was over ten years. The location of the myoma recurrence was different between two groups with higher recurrence rates in the fundal and lateral sides of uterus in the UMLT-M group and in the anterior wall of uterus in the LM group. However, the overall symptom control, the need of repeated myoma-related surgery and subsequent pregnancy outcome of both groups seemed to be similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

More operative time and more blood loss reflected that LM demanded skills, experience and equipment. Therefore, UMLT-M might be a feasible alternative choice in the management of uterine myomas, since it is an easy-to-perform and familiar technique, especially in the absence of suitable equipment or skilled operator. A large and randomized study is needed to confirm the above findings.

摘要

目的

超小切口子宫肌瘤剔除术(UMLT-M,横向皮肤切口小于4cm)和传统三孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术(LM)被提议作为治疗有症状子宫肌瘤女性的替代微创手术方法,但很少有研究比较这两种手术的结果。

材料与方法

2002年1月至2003年12月期间,将71例行UMLT-M手术的患者与71例行LM手术的女性进行比较。所有患者的最后数据收集于2016年12月31日完成。比较参数包括子宫肌瘤的特征、手术参数、发病率和结果。手术参数包括手术时间(分钟)、估计失血量(毫升)、引流管拔除时间、输血百分比和合并症。

结果

LM组的平均手术时间显著长于UMLT-M组(208.7±65.9对98.0±28.2分钟,p<0.001)。LM组术中失血量显著高于UMLT-M组(210.9±184.5对111.7±108.4毫升,p<0.001)。然而,UMLT-M组术后发热的患者更多(39.4%对8.5%,p<0.001)。两组在5年随访时肌瘤复发率有显著差异(UMLT-M组为35.2%,LM组为57.7%,p=0.007),但随访时间超过10年时无差异。两组肌瘤复发部位不同,UMLT-M组子宫底部和侧壁复发率较高,LM组子宫前壁复发率较高。然而,两组的总体症状控制、再次进行肌瘤相关手术的需求以及随后的妊娠结局似乎相似。

结论

更长的手术时间和更多的失血量表明LM需要技术、经验和设备。因此,UMLT-M可能是治疗子宫肌瘤的一种可行替代选择,因为它是一种易于实施且熟悉的技术,尤其是在缺乏合适设备或熟练操作人员的情况下。需要进行一项大型随机研究来证实上述发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验