Mohamed El Sayed Mohamed Abdel Aziz, Al Husseini Hussam
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.
Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):147-152. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_154_17.
The aim of this study was to compare the apical sealing ability of two single-cone filling materials when sealed with different types of root canal sealers.
Eighty extracted maxillary and mandibular canines were selected and their crowns were cut. The root canals were prepared using ProTaper Universal rotary system until size F4 and then divided into seven experimental groups ( = 10 each) and two control groups ( = 5 each). Samples of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were filled with single-cone gutta-percha and AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and EndoSequence BC, respectively. Samples of Groups 4, 5, and 6 were filled similar to the previous groups with the exception of using a single-cone CPoint. Samples of Group 7 were filled with cold gutta-percha lateral condensation technique. To assess apical microleakage, the apical linear dye penetration was measured microscopically and data were statistically analyzed.
All experimental groups showed significantly different dye apical leakage values ( = 0.000). No significant differences were found between Groups 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 ( < 0.05). The lowest mean leakage value was observed in Group 6 (0.95 ± 0.56 mm) while Groups 3 (2.68 ± 0.71 mm) and 5 (2.61 ± 0.71 mm) showed significantly higher mean leakage values.
The lowest apical leakage value was observed with single-cone CPoint/EndoSequence BC but without significant differences when compared with single-cone gutta-percha/AH Plus, single-cone gutta-percha/MTA Fillapex, single-cone CPoint/AH Plus, and lateral condensation technique. Higher apical leakage values were observed with single-cone gutta-percha/EndoSequence BC and CPoint/MTA Fillapex.
本研究旨在比较两种单尖充填材料与不同类型根管封闭剂联合使用时的根尖封闭能力。
选取80颗拔除的上颌和下颌尖牙,截去牙冠。使用ProTaper Universal旋转系统预备根管至F4号,然后分为7个试验组(每组n = 10)和2个对照组(每组n = 5)。第1、2和3组样本分别用单尖牙胶尖和AH Plus、MTA Fillapex、EndoSequence BC进行充填。第4、5和6组样本与前几组类似,只是使用单尖CPoint。第7组样本采用冷牙胶侧方加压充填技术。为评估根尖微渗漏,通过显微镜测量根尖线性染料渗透,并对数据进行统计学分析。
所有试验组的染料根尖渗漏值均有显著差异(P = 0.000)。第1、2、4、6和7组之间未发现显著差异(P < 0.05)。第6组的平均渗漏值最低(0.95 ± 0.56 mm),而第3组(2.68 ± 0.71 mm)和第5组(2.61 ± 0.71 mm)的平均渗漏值显著更高。
单尖CPoint/EndoSequence BC的根尖渗漏值最低,但与单尖牙胶尖/AH Plus、单尖牙胶尖/MTA Fillapex、单尖CPoint/AH Plus及侧方加压充填技术相比,无显著差异。单尖牙胶尖/EndoSequence BC和CPoint/MTA Fillapex的根尖渗漏值更高。