Suppr超能文献

生物陶瓷封闭剂与环氧树脂基封闭剂封闭能力的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Comparison of the sealing ability of bioceramic sealer against epoxy resin based sealer: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

作者信息

Rekha Ramakumar, Kavitha R, Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan, Prabath Singh Vp, Deepthy S, Krishnan Venugopal

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;13(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate if bioceramic sealers had superior sealing properties to epoxy resin-based sealers.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE Ovid (from 1946 onwards), Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and a hand search of references of included articles was also done. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed, and quantitative synthesis was performed for microleakage measured using vertical dye penetration, horizontal dye penetration, and dentin-sealer gap. Summary effect was reported as Standardized Mean Difference with 95% CI. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the imaging modalities, the obturation techniques, and the file systems employed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the sealing ability of bioceramic sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer when measured using the microleakage tests [SMD -0.59(95%CI: 1.74,0.55)]. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences except when manual K-files were used. Heterogeneity was low when sub-group analysis was done.

CONCLUSION

Bioceramic sealers and epoxy resin-based sealers both exhibited comparable sealing ability.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估生物陶瓷封闭剂的封闭性能是否优于环氧树脂基封闭剂。

方法

在以下数据库中进行系统检索:MEDLINE Ovid(自1946年起)、Scopus、谷歌学术、EBSCO,同时还对纳入文章的参考文献进行了手工检索。纳入体外和离体研究。评估偏倚风险,并对使用垂直染料渗透、水平染料渗透和牙本质封闭剂间隙测量的微渗漏进行定量合成。汇总效应报告为标准化均数差及95%置信区间。基于成像方式、充填技术和所采用的锉系统进行亚组分析。

结果

共纳入24项研究。荟萃分析表明,在使用微渗漏试验测量时,生物陶瓷封闭剂和环氧树脂基封闭剂的封闭能力无显著差异[标准化均数差-0.59(95%置信区间:1.74,0.55)]。亚组分析显示,除使用手动K锉时外,无显著差异。进行亚组分析时异质性较低。

结论

生物陶瓷封闭剂和环氧树脂基封闭剂均表现出相当的封闭能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd14/9636474/fb8a19f44060/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验