Suppr超能文献

内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术与外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术治疗原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞的比较

Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

作者信息

Su Pei-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Mar;8(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_10_18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rates of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) and external DCR (EX-DCR) for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANLDO).

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study.

METHODS

Reviewed medical records of PANLDO underwent DCR at Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital from May 2011 to June 2017. Data regarding the lacrimal passage system, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Anatomical success was defined as patency confirmed by intranasal endoscopic inspection of the ostium and successful lacrimal irrigation; functional success was defined as complete resolution of epiphora and positive fluorescein dye disappearance test, which were assessed at postoperative 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy patients (37 males, 133 females, mean age 57 years) underwent 178 DCR surgeries for PANLDO. The overall anatomical success rate was 94.4% (93.5% in EN-DCR vs. 95.8% in EX-DCR, = 0.511) and functional success rate was 90.4% (90.7% in EN-DCR and 90.1% in EX-DCR, = 0.909). Surgical outcomes were comparable between two groups. Complication rate was low in both groups, including 11 cases of early canalicular stent dislodge (7 in EN-DCR, 4 in EX-DCR), one case of postoperative nasal bleeding in EN-DCR, and two skin wound dehiscence and three cutaneous keloid formation in EX-DCR. None of these cases were concluded into surgical failure at the final visit. The time to symptoms relief was statistical significantly shorter in EN-DCR group (1.7 vs. 3.7 weeks in EX-DCR, < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Success rate of DCR for PANLDO in our study was high, and complication rate was low for both endoscopic and external approaches. There was no statistically significant difference between them. EN-DCR provided higher satisfaction due to quicker recovery and lack of external incision. Endoscopic DCR should be considered as the primary treatment of choice for PANLDO.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术(EN-DCR)和外路泪囊鼻腔造口术(EX-DCR)治疗原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞(PANLDO)的成功率。

设计

这是一项回顾性、比较性、非随机临床研究。

方法

回顾2011年5月至2017年6月在远东纪念医院接受泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗PANLDO的病历。分析泪道系统、合并症、手术结果及术后并发症的数据。解剖学成功定义为通过鼻内镜检查造口通畅且泪道冲洗成功;功能成功定义为溢泪完全缓解且荧光素染料消失试验为阳性,于术后6个月评估。

结果

170例患者(男性37例,女性133例,平均年龄57岁)因PANLDO接受了178例泪囊鼻腔造口术。总体解剖学成功率为94.4%(EN-DCR为93.5%,EX-DCR为95.8%,P = 0.511),功能成功率为90.4%(EN-DCR为90.7%,EX-DCR为90.1%,P = 0.909)。两组手术结果相当。两组并发症发生率均较低,包括11例早期泪小管支架移位(EN-DCR组7例,EX-DCR组4例),EN-DCR组1例术后鼻出血,EX-DCR组2例皮肤伤口裂开和3例皮肤瘢痕疙瘩形成。最终随访时这些病例均未被判定为手术失败。EN-DCR组症状缓解时间显著短于EX-DCR组(1.7周对3.7周,P < 0.001)。

结论

本研究中泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗PANLDO的成功率高,内镜和外路手术的并发症发生率均低。两者之间无统计学显著差异。由于恢复更快且无外部切口,EN-DCR的满意度更高。鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术应被视为PANLDO的首选主要治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cec/5890579/b332b983b0e1/TJO-8-19-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验