Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):345-350. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2442-x. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
Our aim was to compare the effects of the surgical drain and kinesiotape applications on postoperative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery in a split-mouth study design.
A single-centre, split-mouth study was performed in 23 patients who needed surgical removal of bilateral mandibular third molars. Each patient was treated with a drain tube on one side of the mandible and Kinesio tape (KT) on the contralateral side.
Swelling was significantly greater in the KT group than in the drain group throughout the study period. The groups did not differ significantly in the amount of trismus at any time point. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-measured pain intensity was significantly lower in the drainage group. Patients with KT had greater postoperative discomfort than those with a drain tube. All patients were generally satisfied with their treatments.
Although both treatments were useful, a surgical drain was significantly more effective at reducing swelling and pain intensity than Kinesio tape. The effects of both on trismus were similar.
本研究旨在通过一项分侧研究比较下颌第三磨牙术后应用引流管和肌内效贴对术后发病率的影响。
在 23 名需要双侧下颌第三磨牙手术切除的患者中进行了一项单中心、分侧研究。每位患者的一侧下颌骨使用引流管,另一侧使用肌内效贴。
在整个研究期间,肿胀在肌内效贴组明显大于引流组。两组在任何时间点的牙关紧闭程度均无显著差异。引流组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛强度明显较低。与引流管组相比,使用肌内效贴的患者术后不适感更大。所有患者对他们的治疗都普遍满意。
尽管两种治疗方法都有效,但引流管在减轻肿胀和疼痛强度方面明显优于肌内效贴。两种方法对牙关紧闭的影响相似。