• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同关注!共同关注提升 3 至 4 岁儿童言语错误信念测试表现

Together I Can! Joint Attention Boosts 3- to 4-Year-Olds' Performance in a Verbal False-Belief Test.

机构信息

Lund University.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):35-50. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13075. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13075
PMID:29676448
Abstract

Effects of joint attention were addressed on 3- to 4-year-olds' performance in a verbal false-Belief Test (FBT), featuring the experimenter as co-watcher rather than narrator. In two experiments, children (N = 183) watched a filmed-FBT jointly with a test leader, disjointed from a test leader, or alone. Children attending jointly with a test leader were more likely to pass the FBT compared with normative data and to spontaneously recall information indicating false-belief understanding, suggesting that joint attention strengthens the plausibility of the FBT and renders plot-critical information more salient. In a third experiment (N = 59), results were replicated using a typical, image-based FBT. Overall findings highlight the profound impact of experimenter as social context in verbal FBTs, and link recall of specific story features to false-belief understanding.

摘要

共同注意对 3 至 4 岁儿童在口头错误信念测试(FBT)中的表现的影响,该测试以实验者为共同观察者而不是叙述者。在两项实验中,儿童(N=183)与测试领导者一起观看了一段录像 FBT,与测试领导者分开观看或单独观看。与测试领导者一起观看的儿童比正常数据更有可能通过 FBT,并自发回忆表明错误信念理解的信息,这表明共同注意增强了 FBT 的合理性,并使情节关键信息更加突出。在第三个实验中(N=59),使用典型的基于图像的 FBT 复制了结果。总体研究结果强调了实验者作为口头 FBT 中社会背景的深远影响,并将特定故事特征的回忆与错误信念理解联系起来。

相似文献

1
Together I Can! Joint Attention Boosts 3- to 4-Year-Olds' Performance in a Verbal False-Belief Test.共同关注!共同关注提升 3 至 4 岁儿童言语错误信念测试表现
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):35-50. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13075. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
2
Let's do it together! The role of interaction in false belief understanding.让我们一起做吧!互动在错误信念理解中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;177:141-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
False-belief understanding and social preference over the first 2 years of school: a longitudinal study.入学后头两年的错误信念理解与社会偏好:一项纵向研究。
Child Dev. 2014 Nov-Dec;85(6):2389-403. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12302. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
Understanding of Goals, Beliefs, and Desires Predicts Morally Relevant Theory of Mind: A Longitudinal Investigation.对目标、信念和欲望的理解可预测与道德相关的心理理论:一项纵向调查。
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1221-32. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12533. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
2.5-Year-Olds Express Suspense When Others Approach Reality With False Expectations.2.5岁幼儿在他人带着错误期望接近现实时会表现出悬念。
Child Dev. 2017 Jan;88(1):114-122. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12581. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Strong and strategic conformity understanding by 3- and 5-year-old children.3 岁和 5 岁儿童的强烈且策略性的一致性理解。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(3):438-451. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12229. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
7
Mistaken max befriends Duplo girl: No difference between a standard and an acted-out false belief task.错误最大值与 Duplo 女孩交朋友:标准和表演出的错误信念任务之间没有区别。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Mar;191:104756. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104756. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks.2.5 岁儿童错误信念理解的研究:来自两个新的口头自发反应任务的证据。
Dev Sci. 2012 Mar;15(2):181-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01103.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
The link between infant attention to goal-directed action and later theory of mind abilities.婴儿对目标导向行为的关注与后期心理理论能力之间的联系。
Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):862-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00736.x.
10
Eighteen-month-olds understand false beliefs in an unexpected-contents task.18 个月大的婴儿能够理解意外内容任务中的错误信念。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Theory of Mind and Young Children's Behaviour: Aggressive, Victimised, Prosocial, and Solitary.心理理论与幼儿行为:攻击行为、受欺负、亲社会行为和孤独行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 20;20(10):5892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105892.
2
Mobile Technology Use and Its Association With Executive Functioning in Healthy Young Adults: A Systematic Review.移动技术的使用及其与健康年轻成年人执行功能的关联:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:643542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643542. eCollection 2021.
3
From Gaze Perception to Social Cognition: The Shared-Attention System.
从注视感知到社会认知:共同注意系统。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 May;16(3):553-576. doi: 10.1177/1745691620953773. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Flexibility in Problem Solving: Analogical Transfer of Tool Use in Toddlers Is Immune to Delay.解决问题的灵活性:幼儿工具使用的类比迁移不受延迟影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:573730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573730. eCollection 2020.
5
Parent-Toddler Social Reciprocity During Reading From Electronic Tablets vs Print Books.使用电子平板电脑与纸质书阅读时的亲子社交互动
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Nov 1;173(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3480.