Bozzaro Claudia, Boldt Joachim, Schweda Mark
Bioethics. 2018 May;32(4):233-239. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12440.
The elderly are often considered a vulnerable group in public and academic bioethical debates and regulations. In this paper, we examine and challenge this assumption and its ethical implications. We begin by systematically delineating the different concepts of vulnerability commonly used in bioethics, before then examining whether these concepts can be applied to old age. We argue that old age should not, in and of itself, be used as a marker of vulnerability, since ageing is a process that can develop in a variety of different ways and is not always associated with particular experiences of vulnerability. We, therefore, turn to more fundamental phenomenological considerations in order to reconstruct from a first person perspective the intricate interconnections between the experiences of ageing and vulnerability. According to this account, ageing and old age are phenomena in which the basic anthropological vulnerability of human beings can manifest itself in an increased likelihood of harm and exploitation. Thus, we plead for a combined model of vulnerability that helps to avoid problems related to the current concepts of vulnerability. We conclude first that old age as such is not a sufficient criterion for being categorized as vulnerable in applied ethics, and second that reflections on ageing can help to develop a better understanding of the central role of vulnerability in human existence and in applied ethics.
在公共及学术性的生物伦理辩论与规范中,老年人常被视为弱势群体。在本文中,我们审视并质疑这一假设及其伦理意涵。我们首先系统地厘清生物伦理学中常用的不同脆弱性概念,然后考察这些概念是否适用于老年群体。我们认为,老年本身不应被用作脆弱性的标志,因为衰老过程可以以多种不同方式发展,且并不总是与特定的脆弱经历相关联。因此,我们转向更基本的现象学考量,以便从第一人称视角重构衰老经历与脆弱性之间的复杂内在联系。据此观点,衰老及老年是这样的现象,即人类基本的人类学意义上的脆弱性可能会以遭受伤害和被剥削的可能性增加的形式表现出来。因此,我们主张采用一种综合的脆弱性模型,以避免与当前脆弱性概念相关的问题。我们首先得出结论,在应用伦理学中,老年本身并非被归类为弱势群体的充分标准;其次,对衰老的思考有助于更好地理解脆弱性在人类生存及应用伦理学中的核心作用。