Özer Tülay, Selçuk Adin, Yılmaz Zahide, Voyvoda Nuray, Çam İsa, Özel Halil Erdem, Özdoğan Fatih, Esen Erkan, Genç Gülden, Genç Selahattin
1 Department of Radiology, Health Sciences University, Derince Education and Research Hospital , Kocaeli , Turkey.
2 Department of ENT, Health Sciences University, Derince Education and Research Hospital , Kocaeli , Turkey.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170322. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170322. Epub 2018 May 3.
The objective of this study was to investigate the association between upper airway morphology and apnea vs hypopnea predominance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome.
A retrospective study on consecutively CT scans obtained from 54 OSA patients and 53 non-snoring controls. CT scans were measured to evaluate upper airway and surrounding structures' morphologic characteristics. OSA patients (matched for age, gender and body mass index) compared as two groups; apneic group: apnea ratio >50% and hypopneic group: hypopnea ratio >50%. Morphologic characteristics were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson's correlation test.
Apneic group (17 patients) showed 76.56% apnea rate and hypopneic group (37 patients) showed 78.46% hypopnea rate. Minimal lateral and anteroposterior dimensions of velopharynx in the apneic group (0.86 ± 0.73 and 0.21 ± 0.13 cm, respectively) was statistically lesser from that of the hypopneic group (1.2 ± 0.42 and 0.54 ± 0.22 cm, respectively). Minimum cross-sectional area of the velopharynx was also lesser in apneic group (0.21 ± 0.16 cm) than that in hypopneic group (0.65 ± 0.38 cm). Almost all upper airway parameters in both apneic and hypopneic groups were tended to be smaller than in controls.
Decrease in airway volume does not signify the type of respiratory event, but significant narrowing of velopharynx in both dimensions; thus having the narrowest value below a certain level causes more apnea. Advances in knowledge: We did not find a similar study when we did a literature search, showing the relationship of apnea vs hypopnea predominance and upper airway parameters in CT in patients with OSA.
本研究旨在调查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)综合征患者上气道形态与呼吸暂停与呼吸不足优势之间的关联。
对54例OSA患者和53例无打鼾对照者连续进行的CT扫描进行回顾性研究。测量CT扫描以评估上气道及周围结构的形态学特征。OSA患者(按年龄、性别和体重指数匹配)分为两组进行比较;呼吸暂停组:呼吸暂停比率>50%,呼吸不足组:呼吸不足比率>50%。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Pearson相关检验分析形态学特征。
呼吸暂停组(17例患者)呼吸暂停率为76.56%,呼吸不足组(37例患者)呼吸不足率为78.46%。呼吸暂停组软腭咽部的最小横向和前后径(分别为0.86±0.73和0.21±0.13cm)在统计学上小于呼吸不足组(分别为1.2±0.42和0.54±0.22cm)。呼吸暂停组软腭咽部的最小横截面积(0.21±0.16cm)也小于呼吸不足组(0.65±0.38cm)。呼吸暂停组和呼吸不足组的几乎所有上气道参数都倾向于小于对照组。
气道容积减小并不意味着呼吸事件的类型,但软腭咽部在两个维度上均显著变窄;因此,在低于某一水平时具有最窄值会导致更多呼吸暂停。知识进展:我们在文献检索时未找到类似研究,该研究显示了OSA患者CT中呼吸暂停与呼吸不足优势以及上气道参数之间的关系。