Suppr超能文献

评估战斗护目镜对爆炸超压的防护效果。

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Combat Eyewear Protection Against Blast Overpressure.

作者信息

Sundaramurthy A, Skotak M, Alay E, Unnikrishnan G, Mao H, Duan X, Williams S T, Harding T H, Chandra N, Reifman J

机构信息

Department of Defense, Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702 e-mail: .

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Injury Biomechanics, Materials and Medicine, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102 e-mail: .

出版信息

J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jul 1;140(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4039823.

Abstract

It is unclear whether combat eyewear used by U. S. Service members is protective against blast overpressures (BOPs) caused by explosive devices. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which BOP bypasses eyewear and increases eye surface pressure. We performed experiments and developed three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of a head form (HF) equipped with an advanced combat helmet (ACH) and with no eyewear, spectacles, or goggles in a shock tube at three BOPs and five head orientations relative to the blast wave. Overall, we observed good agreement between experimental and computational results, with average discrepancies in impulse and peak-pressure values of less than 15% over 90 comparisons. In the absence of eyewear and depending on the head orientation, we identified three mechanisms that contributed to pressure loading on the eyes. Eyewear was most effective at 0 deg orientation, with pressure attenuation ranging from 50 (spectacles) to 80% (goggles) of the peak pressures observed in the no-eyewear configuration. Spectacles and goggles were considerably less effective when we rotated the HF in the counter-clockwise direction around the superior-inferior axis of the head. Surprisingly, at certain orientations, spectacles yielded higher maximum pressures (80%) and goggles yielded larger impulses (150%) than those observed without eyewear. The findings from this study will aid in the design of eyewear that provides better protection against BOP.

摘要

美国军人使用的战斗护目镜是否能抵御爆炸装置产生的冲击波超压(BOP)尚不清楚。在此,我们研究了BOP绕过护目镜并增加眼表压力的机制。我们进行了实验,并开发了头部模型(HF)的三维(3D)有限元(FE)模型,该模型配备了先进战斗头盔(ACH),且在激波管中,相对于爆炸波有三种BOP和五种头部方向,未佩戴护目镜、眼镜或眼罩。总体而言,我们观察到实验结果与计算结果吻合良好,在90次比较中,冲量和峰值压力值的平均差异小于15%。在未佩戴护目镜的情况下,根据头部方向,我们确定了三种导致眼睛压力负荷的机制。护目镜在0°方向最有效,压力衰减范围为无护目镜配置下观察到的峰值压力的50%(眼镜)至80%(护目镜)。当我们围绕头部的上下轴将HF逆时针旋转时,眼镜和护目镜的效果明显较差。令人惊讶的是,在某些方向上,眼镜产生的最大压力更高(80%),护目镜产生的冲量更大(150%),高于未佩戴护目镜时观察到的值。这项研究的结果将有助于设计能更好抵御BOP的护目镜。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验