Hamm Lisa M, Yeoman Janice P, Anstice Nicola, Dakin Steven C
School of Optometry and Vision Science, and New Zealand National Eye Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Optometry and Vision Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
J Vis. 2018 Mar 1;18(3):13. doi: 10.1167/18.3.13.
When measuring recognition acuity in a research setting, the most widely used symbols are the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) set of 10 Sloan letters. However, the symbols are not appropriate for patients unfamiliar with letters, and acuity for individual letters is variable. Alternative pictogram sets are available, but are generally comprised of fewer items. We set out to develop an open-access set of 10 pictograms that would elicit more consistent estimates of acuity across items than the ETDRS letters from visually normal adults. We measured monocular acuity for individual uncrowded optotypes within a newly designed set (The Auckland Optotype [TAO]), the ETDRS set, and Landolt Cs. Eleven visually normal adults were assessed on regular and vanishing formats of each set. Inter-optotype reliability and ability to detect subtle differences between participants were assessed using intraclass correlations (ICC) and fractional rank precision (FRP). The TAO vanishing set showed the strongest performance (ICC = 0.97, FRP = 0.90), followed by the other vanishing sets (Sloan ICC = 0.88, FRP = 0.74; Landolt ICC = 0.86, FRP = 0.80). Within the regular format, TAO again outperformed the existing sets (TAO ICC = 0.77, FRP = 0.75; Sloan ICC = 0.65, FRP = 0.64; Landolt ICC = 0.48, FRP = 0.63). For adults with normal visual acuity, the new optotypes (in both regular and vanishing formats) are more equally legible and sensitive to subtle individual differences than their Sloan counterparts. As this set does not require observers to be able to name Roman letters, and is freely available to use and modify, it may have wide application for measurement of acuity.
在研究环境中测量识别视力时,最常用的符号是糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)中的10个斯隆字母。然而,这些符号不适用于不熟悉字母的患者,而且各个字母的视力情况存在差异。有可供选择的象形图组,但通常项目较少。我们着手开发一套10个象形图的开放获取图集,与ETDRS字母相比,该图集能从视力正常的成年人中获得更一致的视力估计值。我们测量了新设计的图集(奥克兰视标[TAO])、ETDRS图集和兰道环C中各个未拥挤视标的单眼视力。对11名视力正常的成年人在每组视标的常规和消失形式下进行了评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和分数秩精度(FRP)评估视标间的可靠性以及检测参与者之间细微差异的能力。TAO消失视标组表现最强(ICC = 0.97,FRP = 0.90),其次是其他消失视标组(斯隆视标ICC = 0.88,FRP = 0.74;兰道环C ICC = 0.86,FRP = 0.80)。在常规形式下,TAO同样优于现有图集(TAO ICC = 0.77,FRP = 0.75;斯隆视标ICC = 0.65,FRP = 0.64;兰道环C ICC = 0.48,FRP = 0.63)。对于视力正常的成年人来说,新视标(常规和消失形式)比其对应的斯隆视标在可读性上更加均匀一致,并且对个体细微差异更敏感。由于该图集不要求观察者能够识别罗马字母,并且可免费使用和修改,它可能在视力测量中有广泛应用。