• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价 3 所汤加学校 5-15 岁儿童视力筛查:奥克兰视力图和 Lea 符号的比较。

Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.

机构信息

School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

New Zealand National Eye Centre, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):353-360. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12958. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/cxo.12958
PMID:31489704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive vision screening programmes for children are an important part of public health strategy, but do not exist in many countries, including Tonga. This project set out to assess: (1) the functional vision of children attending primary schools in Tonga and (2) how a new recognition acuity test (The Auckland Optotypes displayed on a tablet computer) compares to use of a standardised eye chart in this setting.

METHODS

Children from three Tongan primary schools were invited to participate. Acuity testing was conducted using a standardised recognition acuity chart (Lea symbols) and the tablet test displaying two formats of The Auckland Optotypes. Measures of ocular alignment, stereo acuity and non-cycloplegic photorefraction were also taken.

RESULTS

Parents of 249 children consented to participate. One child was untestable. Only 2.8 per cent of testable children achieved visual acuity worse than 0.3 logMAR in the weaker eye. Results from the Spot Photoscreener suggested that no children had myopia or hyperopia, but that some children had astigmatism. The tablet test was practical in a community setting, and showed ±0.2 logMAR limits of agreement with the Lea symbols chart.

CONCLUSION

The sample of children in Tongan primary schools had good functional vision. A modified version of the tablet acuity test is a promising option for vision screening in this context.

摘要

背景

儿童综合视力筛查计划是公共卫生战略的重要组成部分,但在包括汤加在内的许多国家都没有实施。本项目旨在评估:(1)汤加小学儿童的功能性视力,以及(2)在这种环境下,一种新的识别视力测试(在平板电脑上显示的奥克兰视力测试图)与使用标准化视力表相比的效果。

方法

邀请来自汤加三所小学的儿童参加。使用标准化识别视力表(Lea 符号)和显示两种奥克兰视力测试图格式的平板电脑测试进行视力测试。还测量了眼球对准度、立体视力和非睫状肌光折射。

结果

249 名儿童的家长同意参与。有一名儿童无法测试。在可测试的儿童中,只有 2.8%的儿童在弱眼的视力低于 0.3 logMAR。Spot 照片筛查器的结果表明,没有儿童患有近视或远视,但有些儿童有散光。平板电脑测试在社区环境中实用,与 Lea 符号图表相比,其测试结果的差异在±0.2 logMAR 以内。

结论

汤加小学儿童的样本具有良好的功能性视力。平板电脑视力测试的改良版本是这种情况下视力筛查的一个有前途的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/1faecbe21f9d/CXO-103-353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/3617dd3913b3/CXO-103-353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/6787d98ca25b/CXO-103-353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/b9ee3e246af1/CXO-103-353-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/1faecbe21f9d/CXO-103-353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/3617dd3913b3/CXO-103-353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/6787d98ca25b/CXO-103-353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/b9ee3e246af1/CXO-103-353-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20d0/7216869/1faecbe21f9d/CXO-103-353-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.评价 3 所汤加学校 5-15 岁儿童视力筛查:奥克兰视力图和 Lea 符号的比较。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):353-360. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12958. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of the Parr vision test, single crowded Lea symbols and Spot vision screener for vision screening of preschool children aged 4-5 years in Aotearoa/New Zealand.奥塔哥/新西兰 4-5 岁学龄前儿童视力筛查中 Parr 视力测试、单个拥挤 Lea 符号和 Spot 视力筛查器的诊断准确性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 May;41(3):541-552. doi: 10.1111/opo.12816. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
3
Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.使用拥挤的HOTV和Lea符号视力测试对学龄前儿童进行阈值视力测试。
J AAPOS. 2003 Dec;7(6):396-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00211-8.
4
Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years.用于筛查3至5岁尼日利亚儿童的利氏符号视力表的性能。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;23(10):1381-1386. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_204_19.
5
Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.初步报告:使用利氏符号对幼儿进行检查。
Strabismus. 2000 Sep;8(3):209-13.
6
Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.萨格勒布弱视学龄前筛查研究:近视力和远视力测试提高了弱视筛查的诊断准确性。
Croat Med J. 2016 Feb;57(1):29-41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.29.
7
Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.儿童和成人中帕蒂图片(Patti Pics)视标与利娅符号(Lea Symbols)视标的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Mar;90(3):236-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182825eb7.
8
Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.利氏符号和帕蒂视力表在儿童和成人视力中的一致性。
J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
9
Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes.使用奥克兰视力表测量儿童的视力敏锐度。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Nov;38(6):596-608. doi: 10.1111/opo.12590.
10
A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.散光高患病率幼儿群体中Lea视力符号与ETDRS字母距离视力的比较。
J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Acuity Among Portuguese School-Aged Population.葡萄牙学龄人口的视力情况
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 19;14(8):2824. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082824.
2
Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.新图片式视力测验在弱视儿童中的初步临床验证:奥克兰视力表与拥挤 logMAR 字母的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Dec;36(12):2341-2345. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01840-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox.运用模型比较方法,借助Palamedes工具箱在心理物理学研究中检验特定研究假设。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 23;9:1250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250. eCollection 2018.
2
Patterns of Daily Outdoor Light Exposure in Australian and Singaporean Children.澳大利亚和新加坡儿童的每日户外光照模式
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 May 29;7(3):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.3.8. eCollection 2018 May.
3
The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
奥克兰视标:一套用于测量识别视力的开放获取象形图集。
J Vis. 2018 Mar 1;18(3):13. doi: 10.1167/18.3.13.
4
Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.屈光不正患病率的全球及区域估计:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 27;30(1):3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Investment in child and adolescent health and development: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd Edition.儿童和青少年健康与发展投资:《疾病控制优先》第三版的主要信息。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):687-699. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32417-0. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention.近视的流行:病因与预防。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Jan;62:134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
7
Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.6 个月至 5 岁儿童视力筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):836-844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11260.
8
What Public Policies Should Be Developed to Cope with the Myopia Epidemic?应该制定哪些公共政策来应对近视流行?
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Sep;93(9):1055-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000982.
9
Performance of Spot Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Pre-school and School Age Children Attending an Eye Clinic.点式照片筛查仪在眼科门诊中国学龄前及学龄儿童弱视危险因素检测中的性能表现
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0149561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149561. eCollection 2016.
10
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.全球近视和高度近视的患病率及 2000 至 2050 年的时间趋势。
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 11.