• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组和深度访谈以指导肺癌筛查信息材料的开发。

Focus Groups and In-depth Interviews to Guide the Development of Lung Cancer Screening Informational Materials.

作者信息

Sharma Anushree, O'Connor Richard, Celestino Paula, Killion Samantha, Griswold-Krupski Laurie, Bansal-Travers Maansi

机构信息

U.T. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1330, P.O. Box 301439, Houston, TX, 77230-1439, USA.

Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):712-718. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1362-4.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-018-1362-4
PMID:29679265
Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in the USA. In 2013, new guidelines issued by the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography among a selected group of high-risk individuals. Specifically, lung cancer screening is recommended for heavy smokers between the ages of 55 to 79, with at least 30 pack-year smoking exposure. Former smokers who meet these guidelines and stopped smoking ≤ 15 years ago are also eligible. There is a need to promote lung cancer screening to increase early diagnosis rates and treatment options, thereby decreasing disease-specific mortality. This study was conducted to refine educational materials used to inform eligible high-risk individuals about the risks and benefits of lung cancer screening. Focus groups (n = 16) and in-depth telephone interviews (n = 5) were conducted among screening-eligible participants recruited from western New York. Main themes that emerged from the discussions included cost of obtaining the exam, eligibility criteria/information about the exam, apprehension regarding results, and an increased desire for discussions with their physician to learn more about the screening. The information gained from this study is vital to understanding concerns held by current and former smokers regarding lung cancer screening, as well as critical to determining which information is most valuable for decreasing barriers and correcting misperceptions about the lung cancer screening exam.

摘要

肺癌是美国致死率最高的癌症之一。2013年,美国预防服务工作组发布的新指南建议,在特定高危人群中使用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查。具体而言,建议对年龄在55至79岁之间、吸烟史至少达30包年的重度吸烟者进行肺癌筛查。符合这些标准且在≤15年前戒烟的既往吸烟者也符合条件。有必要推广肺癌筛查,以提高早期诊断率和增加治疗选择,从而降低疾病特异性死亡率。本研究旨在完善用于告知符合条件的高危个体肺癌筛查风险和益处的教育材料。在从纽约西部招募的符合筛查条件的参与者中开展了焦点小组访谈(n = 16)和深度电话访谈(n = 5)。讨论中出现的主要主题包括检查费用、检查的资格标准/信息、对结果的担忧,以及更希望与医生讨论以了解更多关于筛查的信息。从这项研究中获得的信息对于理解当前吸烟者和既往吸烟者对肺癌筛查的担忧至关重要,对于确定哪些信息对于减少障碍和纠正对肺癌筛查检查的误解最有价值也至关重要。

相似文献

1
Focus Groups and In-depth Interviews to Guide the Development of Lung Cancer Screening Informational Materials.焦点小组和深度访谈以指导肺癌筛查信息材料的开发。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):712-718. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1362-4.
2
A qualitative analysis of smokers' perceptions about lung cancer screening.吸烟者对肺癌筛查认知的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4496-0.
3
Evaluating efficacy of current lung cancer screening guidelines.评估现行肺癌筛查指南的有效性。
J Med Screen. 2017 Dec;24(4):208-213. doi: 10.1177/0969141316689111. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.简化标准预测肺癌筛查资格。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Oct;16(10):1280-1285. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC.
5
Lung cancer risk by years since quitting in 30+ pack year smokers.30年烟龄以上、每天吸烟量超过一包的吸烟者戒烟后的肺癌风险(按戒烟年限划分)
J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):151-7. doi: 10.1177/0969141315579119. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Life-Gained-Based Versus Risk-Based Selection of Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening.基于生存获益的与基于风险的吸烟者肺癌筛查选择。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):623-632. doi: 10.7326/M19-1263. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
7
A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening.一项探索个体选择不参加肺癌筛查原因的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 1;34(2):239-244. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw146.
8
Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者决策辅助工具对吸烟人群肺癌筛查决策的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920362. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20362.
9
Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening Among African American Smokers.制定针对非裔美国烟民的肺癌筛查决策价值观声明。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):412-418. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01687-4.
10
Low Rates of Patient-Reported Physician-Patient Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening among Current Smokers: Data from Health Information National Trends Survey.当前吸烟者中患者报告的肺癌筛查医患讨论率较低:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):963-973. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0629.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Workers' Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Resilience During COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医护人员基于正念减压与恢复力的研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 2;17:3691-3713. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S464285. eCollection 2024.
2
Decision Support Tools for Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review of Information Content, Format, and Presentation Methods.用于低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查的决策支持工具:信息内容、格式和呈现方法的范围综述。
Chest. 2022 Oct;162(4):930-941. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.638. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.2015年美国癌症筛查检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 3;66(8):201-206. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1.
2
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.美国的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——2010 年至 2015 年。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416.
3
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.初级保健提供者和患者对肺癌筛查的看法。定性研究。
农村肺癌筛查人群中肺癌筛查的障碍、促进因素和建议干预措施。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720930544. doi: 10.1177/2150132720930544.
4
Correction to: Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening among African American Smokers.对《非裔美国吸烟者肺癌筛查决策价值声明的制定》的更正
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):419-421. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01693-6.
5
MicroRNA-133a inhibits the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting YES1.微小RNA-133a通过靶向YES1抑制非小细胞肺癌的增殖。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Dec;18(6):6759-6765. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11030. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1977-1982. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC.
4
Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians.家庭医生对低剂量计算机断层扫描用于肺癌筛查的了解、态度及使用情况。
Cancer. 2016 Aug 1;122(15):2324-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29944. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Evidence-Based Clinical Prevention in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: The Role of the US Preventive Services Task Force.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》时代基于证据的临床预防:美国预防服务工作组的作用
JAMA. 2015 Nov 17;314(19):2021-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13154.
6
Medicare Approves Coverage for Lung Cancer Screening: The Case for Symptomatic Screening.医疗保险批准肺癌筛查覆盖范围:症状性筛查的案例。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1027-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2165.
7
Patient willingness and barriers to receiving a CT scan for lung cancer screening.患者接受肺癌筛查CT扫描的意愿及障碍。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Jun;84(3):307-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
8
Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330-8. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771.
9
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查可降低肺癌死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
10
Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查后的焦虑、对癌症的恐惧以及感知到的癌症风险。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):917-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08322013. Epub 2008 Aug 25.