Suppr超能文献

采样技术和卧具类型对牛奶微生物群的影响:一项初步研究的结果。

Influence of sampling technique and bedding type on the milk microbiota: Results of a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jul;101(7):6346-6356. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14212. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Abstract

The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the influence of sampling technique and exposure to different bedding types on the milk microbiome of healthy primiparous cows. Primiparous Holstein cows (n = 20) with no history of clinical mastitis or monthly somatic cell counts >150,000 cells/mL were selected for this study. From each enrolled cow, a composite milk sample was aseptically collected from all 4 mammary quarters (individual quarter somatic cell counts <100,000 cells/mL), 1 individual quarter milk sample was collected using conventional aseptic technique, and 2 individual quarter milk samples were collected directly from the gland cistern using a needle and vacuum tube. All milk samples were cultured using standard milk microbiological techniques and DNA was extracted. Extracted DNA was subjected to PCR and next-generation sequencing for microbiota determination. All samples yielded relatively little total DNA. Amplification of PCR was successful in 45, 40, and 83% of composite, conventional, and cisternal samples, respectively. Bacteria were successfully cultured from 35% of composite milk samples but from none of the quarter milk samples collected using conventional or cisternal sampling techniques. Bacterial DNA sequences were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTU) based on 97% sequence similarity, and bacterial richness and diversity were determined. Most samples were dominated by low-prevalence OTU and of the 4,051 identified OTU, only 14 were prevalent at more than 1% each. These included bacteria typically recovered from environmental sources. Chao richness was greatest in composite samples and was 636, 347, and 356 for composite, conventional quarter, and cisternal milk samples, respectively. Shannon diversity was similar among sample types and ranged from 3.88 (quarter) to 4.17 (composite). Richness and diversity did not differ by bedding type among cisternal samples, but the power of this pilot study was limited due to small sample size. Despite the small sample size, for milk samples collected from the gland cistern, overall bacterial community composition differed among bedding types. These results demonstrate that sampling technique and bedding type may be associated with the microbiota detected in bovine milk, and we suggest that these variables should be considered in designing and reporting studies about the milk microbiota.

摘要

本初步研究的目的是评估采样技术和暴露于不同垫料类型对健康初产奶牛牛奶微生物组的影响。选择无临床乳腺炎或每月体细胞计数>150,000 个细胞/ml 病史的初产荷斯坦奶牛(n=20)进行本研究。从每个入组奶牛的所有 4 个乳区(个体乳区体细胞计数<100,000 个细胞/ml)无菌采集混合牛奶样品,使用常规无菌技术采集 1 个个体乳区牛奶样品,使用针和真空管直接从乳池采集 2 个个体乳区牛奶样品。所有牛奶样品均采用标准牛奶微生物学技术培养并提取 DNA。提取的 DNA 进行 PCR 和下一代测序以确定微生物组。所有样品均产生相对较少的总 DNA。复合、常规和乳池样品的 PCR 扩增成功率分别为 45%、40%和 83%。从 35%的混合牛奶样品中成功培养出细菌,但从使用常规或乳池采样技术采集的任何一个乳区牛奶样品中均未培养出细菌。细菌 DNA 序列根据 97%的序列相似性被分配到操作分类单元(OTU),并确定细菌丰富度和多样性。大多数样品以低流行度 OTU 为主,在 4051 个鉴定的 OTU 中,只有 14 个每个都占 1%以上。这些细菌包括通常从环境来源中回收的细菌。复合样品的 Chao 丰富度最大,分别为 636、347 和 356,复合、常规乳区和乳池牛奶样品。样本类型之间的 Shannon 多样性相似,范围为 3.88(乳区)至 4.17(复合)。乳池样品中,垫料类型之间的丰富度和多样性没有差异,但由于样本量小,本初步研究的效能有限。尽管样本量小,但对于从乳池采集的牛奶样品,不同垫料类型之间的细菌群落组成存在差异。这些结果表明,采样技术和垫料类型可能与牛牛奶中检测到的微生物组有关,我们建议在设计和报告关于牛奶微生物组的研究时应考虑这些变量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验