Suppr超能文献

阅读小说的利弊:饮食失调、解读与创造性阅读疗法研究的理由

Fiction-reading for good or ill: eating disorders, interpretation and the case for creative bibliotherapy research.

作者信息

Troscianko Emily T

出版信息

Med Humanit. 2018 Sep;44(3):201-211. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011375. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

Abstract

Compared with self-help bibliotherapy, little is known about the efficacy of creative bibliotherapy or the mechanisms of its possible efficacy for eating disorders or any other mental health condition. It is clear, however, that fiction is widely used informally as a therapeutic or antitherapeutic tool and that it has considerable potential in both directions, with a possibly significant distinction between the effects of reading fiction about eating disorders (which may-contrary to theoretical predictions-be broadly negative in effect) or one's preferred genre of other fiction (which may be broadly positive). Research on creative bibliotherapy, especially systematic experimental research, is lacking and requires a medical humanities approach, drawing on knowledge and methods from psychology and cognitive literary studies as well as clinical disciplines to expand our understanding of how the dynamic processes of interpretation mediate between textual structures and characteristics of mental health and illness.

摘要

与自助式阅读疗法相比,关于创造性阅读疗法对饮食失调或任何其他心理健康状况的疗效及其可能疗效的机制,我们所知甚少。然而,很明显,小说在非正式场合广泛用作一种治疗或反治疗工具,并且在这两个方面都有相当大的潜力,阅读关于饮食失调的小说(其效果可能与理论预测相反,大致为负面)或阅读个人偏爱的其他小说类型(其效果可能大致为正面)之间可能存在显著差异。目前缺乏关于创造性阅读疗法的研究,尤其是系统性实验研究,这需要一种医学人文方法,借鉴心理学、认知文学研究以及临床学科的知识和方法,以扩展我们对阐释的动态过程如何在文本结构与心理健康和疾病特征之间起中介作用的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验