Troscianko Emily T
1The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (TORCH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Radcliffe Humanities, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
J Eat Disord. 2018 Apr 16;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40337-018-0191-5. eCollection 2018.
There is growing evidence for the efficacy of self-help bibliotherapy as a treatment for eating disorders, although little understanding of how specific linguistic characteristics may enhance or constrain its effects. Meanwhile, 'creative bibliotherapy' (the therapeutic use of fiction, poetry, or sometimes film, rather than self-help books) is widely practised, but even more poorly understood than the self-help variety: although a range of theoretical models exist, claims of the healing power of literature are far more commonly made than tested.
An online survey including quantitative (forced-choice) and qualitative (free-response) items was designed and administered in collaboration with the charity Beat to investigate the connections between respondents' reading habits and their mental health, with a focus on eating disorders, and attracted 885 respondents. Responses to two sequences of questions, exploring the differential effects of fiction about eating disorders versus respondents' preferred genre of other fiction on the dimensions of mood, self-esteem, feelings about one's body, and diet and exercise habits, were analysed using a 2 × 2 repeat measures factorial ANOVA design for each of the four dependent variables.
Surprisingly, fiction about eating disorders was perceived by respondents as broadly detrimental to mood, self-esteem, feelings about their bodies, and diet and exercise habits, while respondents' preferred genre of other fiction was experienced as beneficial to mood and broadly neutral on the other three dimensions. The free-response data added detail to these core findings, as well as suggesting numerous other possible effects and mechanisms, drawing attention to the roles of positive and negative feedback structures and of highly selective interpretive filtering, and highlighting the dangers of 'self-triggering': using books to deliberately exacerbate an eating disorder.
The findings directly challenge existing theoretical models of creative-bibliotherapeutic mechanisms, which tend to insist on the importance of a close match between the reader's and the protagonist's situations. They point the way forward for a new programme of clinical research and practice by suggesting other ways to conceive of how embodied cognitive acts of textually cued interpretation may intervene in the psychopathology of an eating disorder - for good and for ill.
越来越多的证据表明自助式阅读疗法对饮食失调症有治疗效果,不过对于特定语言特征如何增强或限制其效果,人们了解甚少。与此同时,“创造性阅读疗法”(使用小说、诗歌,有时也包括电影进行治疗,而非自助书籍)被广泛应用,但人们对它的了解比对自助式阅读疗法更少:尽管存在一系列理论模型,但关于文学治疗功效的说法更多是未经检验的断言。
与慈善机构“战胜饮食失调”合作设计并开展了一项在线调查,其中包括定量(强制选择)和定性(自由回答)项目,旨在调查受访者的阅读习惯与他们心理健康之间的联系,重点关注饮食失调症,共吸引了885名受访者。针对两组问题的回答进行了分析,这两组问题探讨了关于饮食失调的小说与受访者偏爱的其他小说类型在情绪、自尊、对自身身体的感受以及饮食和运动习惯等方面的不同影响,对四个因变量中的每一个都采用了2×2重复测量析因方差分析设计。
令人惊讶的是,受访者认为关于饮食失调的小说总体上对情绪、自尊、对自身身体的感受以及饮食和运动习惯有不利影响,而受访者偏爱的其他小说类型则被认为对情绪有益,在其他三个方面总体上呈中性。自由回答的数据为这些核心发现增添了细节,还暗示了许多其他可能的影响和机制,提请人们注意积极和消极反馈结构以及高度选择性解释过滤的作用,并强调了“自我触发”的危险:即利用书籍故意加剧饮食失调。
这些发现直接挑战了现有的创造性阅读疗法机制理论模型,这些模型往往坚持读者与主人公情境紧密匹配的重要性。它们为新的临床研究和实践项目指明了方向,提出了其他思考方式,即文本线索解读的具身认知行为可能如何干预饮食失调的精神病理学——无论是产生好的还是坏的影响。