Postma Albert, Morel Sascha G, Slot Margot E, Oudman Erik, Kessels Roy P C
Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Korsakoff Center Slingedael, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1861-1868. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5266-7. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
The present study focused on interference in a group of patients with amnesia due to Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) within the domain of spatial memory. An object-location memory task was used in which participants first learned an array of objects on a computer screen, followed by a reconstruction of the object positions. Next a trial was given in which the same objects were presented only now in different locations. Participants had to place the objects a second time but at the new locations. This was repeated for seven pairs of baseline/interference trials. Both Korsakoff patients and matched controls did worse on the interference trials than on the baseline trials, indicating that it is difficult to relearn new spatial locations for objects that previously were remembered in other locations. When computing relative interference effects (that is the percentage change from baseline in the interference trials), Korsakoff patients were less affected than controls. It is discussed in how far interference depends on the strength of the original memories, which are markedly lower in KS patients.
本研究聚焦于对一组因科尔萨科夫综合征(KS)导致失忆的患者在空间记忆领域的干扰情况。采用了一项物体位置记忆任务,参与者首先在电脑屏幕上学习一组物体的排列,随后进行物体位置的重建。接下来进行一次试验,此时相同的物体仅在不同位置呈现。参与者必须再次放置这些物体,但要放在新的位置。对七组基线/干扰试验重复此过程。科尔萨科夫患者和匹配的对照组在干扰试验中的表现均比基线试验差,这表明对于之前在其他位置记住的物体,重新学习新的空间位置很困难。在计算相对干扰效应(即干扰试验相对于基线的百分比变化)时,科尔萨科夫患者比对照组受影响更小。文中讨论了干扰在多大程度上取决于原始记忆的强度,而科尔萨科夫患者的原始记忆强度明显较低。