Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Linguistics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Mental Health Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1419-1427.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
Although challenging, adults can learn non-native phonetic contrasts with extensive training [1, 2], indicative of perceptual learning beyond an early sensitivity period [3, 4]. Training can alter low-level sensory encoding of newly acquired speech sound patterns [5]; however, the time-course, behavioral relevance, and long-term retention of such sensory plasticity is unclear. Some theories argue that sensory plasticity underlying signal enhancement is immediate and critical to perceptual learning [6, 7]. Others, like the reverse hierarchy theory (RHT), posit a slower time-course for sensory plasticity [8]. RHT proposes that higher-level categorical representations guide immediate, novice learning, while lower-level sensory changes do not emerge until expert stages of learning [9]. We trained 20 English-speaking adults to categorize a non-native phonetic contrast (Mandarin lexical tones) using a criterion-dependent sound-to-category training paradigm. Sensory and perceptual indices were assayed across operationally defined learning phases (novice, experienced, over-trained, and 8-week retention) by measuring the frequency-following response, a neurophonic potential that reflects fidelity of sensory encoding, and the perceptual identification of a tone continuum. Our results demonstrate that while robust changes in sensory encoding and perceptual identification of Mandarin tones emerged with training and were retained, such changes followed different timescales. Sensory changes were evidenced and related to behavioral performance only when participants were over-trained. In contrast, changes in perceptual identification reflecting improvement in categorical percept emerged relatively earlier. Individual differences in perceptual identification, and not sensory encoding, related to faster learning. Our findings support the RHT-sensory plasticity accompanies, rather than drives, expert levels of non-native speech learning.
虽然具有挑战性,但成年人可以通过广泛的训练来学习非母语的语音对比[1,2],这表明感知学习超越了早期敏感时期[3,4]。训练可以改变新习得的语音模式的低级感觉编码[5];然而,这种感觉可塑性的时间进程、行为相关性和长期保持尚不清楚。一些理论认为,信号增强的感觉可塑性是即时的,对感知学习至关重要[6,7]。另一些理论,如逆向层次理论(RHT),则认为感觉可塑性的时间进程较慢[8]。RHT 提出,更高层次的类别表示指导即时的新手学习,而较低层次的感觉变化直到学习的专家阶段才会出现[9]。我们训练了 20 名以英语为母语的成年人,使用基于标准的声音到类别训练范式来对非母语语音对比(汉语声调)进行分类。通过测量频率跟随反应(一种反映感觉编码保真度的神经音潜力)和声调连续体的感知识别,在操作定义的学习阶段(新手、经验丰富、过度训练和 8 周保留)检测感觉和感知指标。我们的结果表明,尽管在训练中出现了对汉语声调的感觉编码和感知识别的强烈变化,并且这些变化得以保留,但这些变化遵循不同的时间尺度。只有当参与者过度训练时,才会出现感觉变化,并与行为表现相关。相比之下,反映类别知觉改善的感知识别变化相对较早出现。反映更快学习的是感知识别的个体差异,而不是感觉编码。我们的发现支持 RHT-感觉可塑性伴随着而非驱动非母语言语学习的专家水平。