Xu Zhili, Chen Linglong, Jin Shuang, Yang Baohua, Chen Xinguo, Wu Zhang
Department of Emergency, Wenzhou People Hospital.
Int Heart J. 2018 May 30;59(3):503-509. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-289. Epub 2018 May 20.
Palliative care might be beneficial to heart failure. However, the results remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of palliative care on heart failure.PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of palliative care versus usual care on heart failure were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcome was readmission. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model.Five RCTs involving 545 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention, palliative care intervention was found to significantly reduce the readmission [Std. mean difference = 0.79; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.23 to 1.35; P = 0.006], Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) (Std. mean difference = -2.5; 95% CI = -4.39 to -0.62; P = 0.009), and PHQ-9 (Std. mean difference = -1.16; 95% CI = -1.73 to -0.58; P < 0.005), as well as improve heart failure questionnaire (Std. mean difference = 4.46; 95% CI = 3.44 to 5.47; P < 0.005), but had no influence on mortality (RR = 1.54; 95% CI = 0.80 to 2.96; P = 0.19) and quality of life questionnaire (Std. mean difference = 1.81; 95% CI = -0.14 to 3.77; P = 0.07).Compared with control intervention, palliative care intervention was found to significantly reduce readmission, ESAS, PHQ-9, and improve heart failure questionnaire, but showed no influence on mortality and quality of life questionnaire in patients with heart failure.
姑息治疗可能对心力衰竭有益。然而,结果仍存在争议。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以探讨姑息治疗对心力衰竭的影响。系统检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆数据库。纳入评估姑息治疗与常规治疗对心力衰竭影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究者独立检索文章、提取数据并评估纳入研究的质量。主要结局是再入院。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析纳入了5项涉及545例患者的RCT。总体而言,与对照干预相比,发现姑息治疗干预可显著降低再入院率[标准化均值差=0.79;95%置信区间(CI)=0.23至1.35;P=0.006]、埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)(标准化均值差=-2.5;95%CI=-4.39至-0.62;P=0.009)和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)(标准化均值差=-1.16;95%CI=-1.73至-0.58;P<0.005),并改善心力衰竭问卷(标准化均值差=4.46;95%CI=3.44至5.47;P<0.005),但对死亡率(RR=1.54;95%CI=0.80至2.96;P=0.19)和生活质量问卷(标准化均值差=1.81;95%CI=-0.14至3.77;P=0.07)无影响。与对照干预相比,发现姑息治疗干预可显著降低心力衰竭患者的再入院率、ESAS、PHQ-9,并改善心力衰竭问卷,但对死亡率和生活质量问卷无影响。