Suppr超能文献

半月板修复后的康复:一项系统综述

Rehabilitation following meniscal repair: a systematic review.

作者信息

Spang Iii Robert C, Nasr Michael C, Mohamadi Amin, DeAngelis Joseph P, Nazarian Ara, Ramappa Arun J

机构信息

Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Apr 9;4(1):e000212. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000212. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review existing biomechanical and clinical evidence regarding postoperative weight-bearing and range of motion restrictions for patients following meniscal repair surgery.

METHODS AND DATA SOURCES

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline, we searched MEDLINE using following search strategy: (((("Weight-Bearing/physiology"[Mesh]) OR "Range of Motion, Articular"[Mesh]) OR "Rehabilitation"[Mesh])) AND ("Menisci, Tibial"[Mesh]). Additional articles were derived from previous reviews. Eligible studies were published in English and reported a rehabilitation protocol following meniscal repair on human. We summarised rehabilitation protocols and patients' outcome among original studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen clinical studies were included in this systematic review. There was wide variation in rehabilitation protocols among clinical studies. Biomechanical evidence from small cadaveric studies suggests that higher degrees of knee flexion and weight-bearing may be safe following meniscal repair and may not compromise the repair. An accelerated protocol with immediate weight-bearing at tolerance and early motion to non-weight-bearing with immobilising up to 6 weeks postoperatively is reported. Accelerated rehabilitation protocols are not associated with higher failure rates following meniscal repair.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal postoperative protocol following meniscal repair. Small clinical studies support rehabilitation protocols that allow early motion. Additional studies are needed to better clarify the interplay between tear type, repair method and optimal rehabilitation protocol.

摘要

目的

回顾关于半月板修复术后患者负重及活动范围限制的现有生物力学和临床证据。

方法和数据来源

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,我们使用以下检索策略在MEDLINE中进行检索:((((“负重/生理学”[医学主题词])或“关节活动范围”[医学主题词])或“康复”[医学主题词])) 且(“半月板,胫骨”[医学主题词])。其他文章来源于既往综述。纳入的研究需以英文发表,并报道了人类半月板修复后的康复方案。我们总结了原始研究中的康复方案及患者结局。

结果

本系统评价纳入了17项临床研究。临床研究中的康复方案差异很大。小型尸体研究的生物力学证据表明,半月板修复后更高程度的膝关节屈曲和负重可能是安全的,且可能不会影响修复效果。据报道有一种加速康复方案,即术后立即耐受负重,早期活动至不负重,固定长达6周。加速康复方案与半月板修复术后较高的失败率无关。

结论

关于半月板修复术后的最佳康复方案,目前尚无共识。小型临床研究支持允许早期活动的康复方案。需要更多研究来更好地阐明撕裂类型、修复方法与最佳康复方案之间的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f14/5905745/a3f4f607af0c/bmjsem-2016-000212f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验