Shelbourne K D, Patel D V, Adsit W S, Porter D A
Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Clin Sports Med. 1996 Jul;15(3):595-612.
Meniscal repair as an isolated procedure should be considered for patients who present with clinically symptomatic meniscal tears and who have large, unstable, peripheral, bucket-handle meniscal tears at arthroscopy. Successful repair relieves meniscal symptoms and allows the patient to return to full function. In the authors' study population, patients with adequate repair of the meniscal tears followed a rehabilitation program that allowed immediate ROM and weight bearing as tolerated. They achieved a clinical result comparable to patients who followed a restrictive rehabilitation program. By using a less restrictive rehabilitation program, surgeons may offer patients who require meniscal repairs a program with a shorter interval between the surgical procedure and full return to the activities of daily living and athletics than was offered by previous regimens. From the evidence obtained from the study population using the authors' selection criteria and surgical technique, the accelerated rehabilitation program does not compromise the clinical result. The follow-up period is too short to determine if repair will be successful in protecting the knee joint from the known degenerative changes that follow meniscectomy. It is certain, however, that surgical repair that preserves meniscal tissue can relieve symptoms and allow patients to return to activities at their own pace. Many questions remain to be answered, all of which need to be addressed in the future: What is the natural history of an untreated meniscal tear in an ACL-stable and in an ACL-injured knee? Is suturing necessary for meniscal tears? If so, what type of suturing technique should be used? Is some type of meniscal abrasion or stimulation of the meniscal tear needed to obtain healing? What is the likelihood of a healed, repaired meniscus to retear in the future, even if the initial repair has been successful, especially on the medial side? At present, there is no universal agreement as to what rehabilitation protocol is best. For the past 8 years, the authors have undertaken an accelerated rehabilitation program following isolated meniscal repairs and also following repairs performed in conjunction with ACL reconstructions. With constant patient evaluation and follow-up, clinically successful results have been achieved. A well-designed, prospective, multicenter study of isolated meniscal repair comparing different rehabilitation protocols is desirable to resolve the existing controversial issue of rehabilitation after meniscal repair.
对于那些出现临床症状性半月板撕裂且在关节镜检查时存在大的、不稳定的、周边的、桶柄状半月板撕裂的患者,应考虑将半月板修复作为一种单独的手术方法。成功的修复可缓解半月板症状,并使患者恢复到完全功能状态。在作者的研究人群中,半月板撕裂得到充分修复的患者遵循了一种康复计划,该计划允许在耐受的情况下立即进行关节活动度(ROM)训练和负重。他们取得的临床结果与遵循严格康复计划的患者相当。通过采用限制较少的康复计划,外科医生可以为需要半月板修复的患者提供一个手术操作与完全恢复日常生活及运动之间间隔时间比以往方案更短的计划。根据使用作者的选择标准和手术技术从研究人群中获得的证据,加速康复计划不会影响临床结果。随访期太短,无法确定修复是否能成功保护膝关节免受半月板切除术后已知的退行性改变。然而,可以确定的是,保留半月板组织的手术修复可以缓解症状,并让患者按照自己的节奏恢复活动。仍有许多问题有待解答,所有这些问题都需要在未来加以解决:在ACL稳定和ACL损伤的膝关节中,未经治疗的半月板撕裂的自然病程是怎样的?半月板撕裂是否需要缝合?如果需要,应使用哪种缝合技术?为了实现愈合,是否需要某种类型的半月板磨损或刺激半月板撕裂处?即使初始修复成功,尤其是在内侧,愈合的、修复后的半月板未来再次撕裂的可能性有多大?目前,对于哪种康复方案最佳尚无普遍共识。在过去8年中,作者在单独的半月板修复后以及与ACL重建联合进行的修复后都采用了加速康复计划。通过持续的患者评估和随访,取得了临床上的成功结果。一项精心设计的、前瞻性的、多中心的关于单独半月板修复并比较不同康复方案的研究,对于解决半月板修复后现有有争议的康复问题是很有必要的。