Suppr超能文献

单纯半月板修复后的康复方案:一项系统评价

Rehabilitation Protocols After Isolated Meniscal Repair: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

O'Donnell Kevin, Freedman Kevin B, Tjoumakaris Fotios P

机构信息

Rothman Institute Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1687-1697. doi: 10.1177/0363546516667578. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current postoperative rehabilitation protocols after isolated meniscal repair vary widely. No consensus exists with regard to the optimal amount of weightbearing, range of motion, or speed at which the patient progresses through the rehabilitation phases. Confounding factors including concomitant ligamentous or cartilaginous injuries have made studying isolated meniscal tears problematic.

PURPOSE

To systematically review and evaluate the influence of range of motion and weightbearing status during the postoperative rehabilitation period after isolated meniscal repair on clinical efficacy and outcome scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. The selection criteria for inclusion were English-language in vivo clinical studies reporting on isolated meniscal repairs utilizing an arthroscopically assisted technique that outlined the postoperative rehabilitation protocol and included at least a 2-year follow-up. Titles, abstracts, and articles were reviewed, and data concerning patient demographics, tear type, repair technique, postoperative protocol details, clinical failures, and outcome scores were extracted from the eligible studies. Rehabilitation protocols were divided into "accelerated," "motion restricted," "weight restricted," and "dual restricted" according to the limitations placed on the treatment groups.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, containing 17 different treatment groups, met the inclusion criteria. The 2 accelerated groups, 2 motion-restricted groups, 4 weight-restricted groups, and 9 dual-restricted groups showed similar efficacy in terms of clinical success and postoperative outcome scores. Early range of motion and weightbearing status showed no influence over clinical outcomes. Of the 17 groups, 13 reported a greater than 70% clinical success rate with significant variation in the tear type, fixation technique, and postoperative restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Early range of motion and immediate postoperative weightbearing appear to have no detrimental effect on the chances for clinical success after isolated meniscal repair. Significant variation exists between postoperative protocols, with no current consensus on the ideal parameters for weightbearing and range of motion. Studies reporting outcomes regarding isolated meniscal repair are limited. Future research should include determining the ideal combination of weightbearing and range of motion for specific tear types.

摘要

背景

目前单纯半月板修复术后的康复方案差异很大。关于最佳负重程度、活动范围或患者在康复阶段进展的速度,尚未达成共识。包括合并韧带或软骨损伤在内的混杂因素使得对单纯半月板撕裂的研究存在问题。

目的

系统评价和评估单纯半月板修复术后康复期间的活动范围和负重状态对临床疗效和结果评分的影响。

研究设计

系统评价。

方法

检索了PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。纳入标准为采用关节镜辅助技术进行单纯半月板修复的英文体内临床研究,该研究概述了术后康复方案并包括至少2年的随访。对标题、摘要和文章进行了审查,并从符合条件的研究中提取了有关患者人口统计学、撕裂类型、修复技术、术后方案细节、临床失败情况和结果评分的数据。根据对治疗组的限制,将康复方案分为“加速”、“活动受限”、“负重受限”和“双重受限”。

结果

15项研究,包含17个不同的治疗组,符合纳入标准。2个加速组、2个活动受限组、4个负重受限组和9个双重受限组在临床成功率和术后结果评分方面显示出相似的疗效。早期活动范围和负重状态对临床结果无影响。在17个组中,13个组报告临床成功率大于70%,撕裂类型、固定技术和术后限制存在显著差异。

结论

早期活动范围和术后立即负重似乎对单纯半月板修复术后的临床成功机会没有不利影响。术后方案之间存在显著差异,目前对于负重和活动范围的理想参数尚无共识。报告单纯半月板修复结果的研究有限。未来的研究应包括确定特定撕裂类型的负重和活动范围的理想组合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验