Suppr超能文献

老年人及其家庭对有意义使用临床总结的偏好。

Preferences of older adults and their families for Meaningful Use clinical summaries.

作者信息

Colorafi Karen, Greenes Robert A, Kates Marc

机构信息

College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Mhealth. 2018 Mar 30;4:8. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.04. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the perceptions of older adults regarding the plan of care (POC) contained in the clinical summary mandated by the Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was selected for this study. Older adults (≥65) with chronic cardiac diagnoses were invited to participate. The investigator shadowed the physician during the patient encounter, interviewed the patients following their encounter, and asked patients to complete standard health literacy and cognitive screening tools and the Patient Activation Measure. Directed content analysis was used to analyze transcripts.

RESULTS

Patients (n=40) found the clinical summary useful for sharing information with family members and other physicians, reminding and informing, and for engaging in behavior change. Seventy-six percent reported that they would not go online to access the clinical summary for multiple reasons, including not being "computer savvy" and privacy concerns. Participant recommendations for a re-designed, improved clinical summary are included. The clinical summary helps patients and families communicate among health care professionals in a complex, disjointed health care system that often burdens patients with that responsibility. The majority of participants were happy with the paper version and offered multiple reasons for not wanting online access that may help us to focus on more compelling reasons for patient portal use.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitatively, it appears that the clinical summary is a useful tool for engaging people with chronic disease in self-management. The participants in this study told us what many of us already know to be true; that the documentation we provide patients and families is less than ideal.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了老年人对电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划规定的临床总结中所包含的护理计划(POC)的看法。

方法

本研究采用定性描述性设计。邀请患有慢性心脏疾病诊断的老年人(≥65岁)参与。研究者在患者就诊期间跟随医生,就诊后对患者进行访谈,并要求患者完成标准的健康素养和认知筛查工具以及患者激活量表。采用定向内容分析法分析转录本。

结果

患者(n = 40)发现临床总结有助于与家庭成员和其他医生分享信息、提醒和告知,以及促进行为改变。76%的患者表示,由于多种原因,他们不会上网获取临床总结,包括不“精通电脑”和隐私担忧。文中包含了参与者对重新设计、改进后的临床总结的建议。临床总结有助于患者和家庭在复杂、脱节的医疗系统中与医疗保健专业人员进行沟通,而这个系统常常将这种责任加诸于患者身上。大多数参与者对纸质版本感到满意,并给出了不希望在线获取的多种原因,这些原因可能有助于我们关注促使患者使用患者门户网站的更有说服力的理由。

结论

从定性角度来看,临床总结似乎是促使慢性病患者进行自我管理的有用工具。本研究中的参与者告诉了我们许多人已经知道的事实;即我们提供给患者和家庭的文件并不理想。

相似文献

1
Preferences of older adults and their families for Meaningful Use clinical summaries.
Mhealth. 2018 Mar 30;4:8. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.04. eCollection 2018.
3
A content analysis of the Meaningful Use clinical summary: do clinical summaries promote patient engagement?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 May;17(3):238-51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000353. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
Assessing the value of the Meaningful Use Clinical Summary for patients and families with pediatric asthma.
J Asthma. 2018 Oct;55(10):1068-1076. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1391283. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Assessing the Quality of the After-Visit Summary (AVS) in a Primary-Care Clinic.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jan-Feb;32(1):65-68. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.180055.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Use and Usefulness of After-Visit Summaries by Language and Health Literacy among Latinx and Chinese Primary Care Patients.
J Health Commun. 2020 Aug 2;25(8):632-639. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1833385. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
3
Using Electronic Health Record Portals to Improve Patient Engagement: Research Priorities and Best Practices.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S123-S129. doi: 10.7326/M19-0876.
5
Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):871-883. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz054.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research.
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
2
Improving dementia care: the role of screening and detection of cognitive impairment.
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.08.008. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
3
Writing usable qualitative health research findings.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1404-13. doi: 10.1177/1049732312450368. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
4
Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):783-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1629-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
5
Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 16;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
6
Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
7
Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;21(4):349-55. doi: 10.1002/gps.1470.
8
Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
10
Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验