Suppr超能文献

III 期免疫检查点阻断试验在非小细胞肺癌中的推广和代表性。

Generalization and representativeness of phase III immune checkpoint blockade trials in non-small cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jun;9(6):736-744. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12641. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strict eligibility criteria for patient enrollment in phase III trials raise questions regarding generalization to ineligible patients. We evaluated whether pivotal phase III trials of immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) represent the overall population of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the inclusion and exclusion criteria of three phase III trials (CheckMate057, CheckMate017, and KEYNOTE-010). Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2011 to 2013 at Seoul National University Hospital (cohort 1) were reviewed. We also analyzed the criteria in 53 patients with NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as routine practice (cohort 2).

RESULTS

Among the 715 patients in cohort 1, 499 (69.9%) were ineligible for the three trials. Reasons for ineligibility included: no prior platinum doublet treatment (23.6%), lack of tissue availability (22.7%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 1 (14.1%), steroid use (18.2%), active cerebral nervous system metastasis (8.3%), hepatitis B/hepatitis C/human immunodeficiency virus (8.0%), and no measurable lesion (7.3%). EGFR mutations were more common in the ineligible group. In cohort 2, 67.9% of patients were classified as ineligible. Treatment outcomes of ICB in cohort 2 appeared inferior to those in the three pivotal trials, with a response rate of 11.3% and median progression-free survival of 1.67 months.

CONCLUSION

Only 30% of NSCLC patients were eligible for ICB phase III trials. The actual efficacy in the 70% of ineligible patients is unknown. These findings suggest a huge gap between practice-changing phase III trials and the overall population of NSCLC patients.

摘要

背景

三期临床试验对患者入组的严格条件标准引发了对其是否适用于不合格患者的疑问。我们评估了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICB)的关键性三期试验是否代表了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的总体人群。

方法

我们回顾了三项三期试验(CheckMate057、CheckMate017 和 KEYNOTE-010)的纳入和排除标准。对 2011 年至 2013 年在首尔国立大学医院诊断的 IIIB 或 IV 期 NSCLC 患者(队列 1)进行了回顾。我们还分析了 53 例接受纳武单抗或帕博利珠单抗常规治疗的 NSCLC 患者的标准(队列 2)。

结果

队列 1 中的 715 名患者中,有 499 名(69.9%)不符合三项试验的标准。不合格的原因包括:无先前的铂类双联化疗(23.6%)、组织不可用(22.7%)、东部合作肿瘤组体力状态>1(14.1%)、使用类固醇(18.2%)、有活动性脑转移(8.3%)、乙型肝炎/丙型肝炎/人类免疫缺陷病毒(8.0%)和无可测量病灶(7.3%)。在不合格组中,EGFR 突变更为常见。在队列 2 中,67.9%的患者被归类为不合格。队列 2 中 ICB 的治疗结果似乎不如三项关键性试验,客观缓解率为 11.3%,中位无进展生存期为 1.67 个月。

结论

只有 30%的 NSCLC 患者有资格参加 ICB 三期试验。70%不合格患者的实际疗效尚不清楚。这些发现表明,改变实践的三期试验与 NSCLC 患者的总体人群之间存在巨大差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bdf/6456815/a58b156eea8c/TCA-9-736-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验