• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

32毫米陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术与28毫米陶瓷轴承:5至15年随访研究

32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study.

作者信息

Higuchi Yoshitoshi, Seki Taisuke, Hasegawa Yukiharu, Takegami Yasuhiko, Morita Daigo, Ishiguro Naoki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2019 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1177/1120700018760971. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/1120700018760971
PMID:29683031
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 28-mm ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to those of 32-mm CoC during a 5- to 15-year follow-up period.

METHODS

: 107 joints (95 women and 6 men) underwent 28-mm CoC, and 60 (49 women and 7 men) underwent 32-mm CoC. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 56.1 and 55.7 years in the 28-mm and 32-mm CoC groups, respectively. Clinical and radiologic measurements of all patients were analysed.

RESULTS

: The mean preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was similar in the 2 groups (28-mm, 58.9; and 32-mm, 58.5). However, at final follow-up, the mean HHS of the 32-mm CoC (91.8) was significantly better than that of the 28-mm CoC (88.2) ( p = 0.003), as were the ranges of motion (ROM) for flexion (98.3 ± 13.5° vs. 87.3 ± 19.3°, p < 0.001) and abduction (27.8 ± 14.9° vs. 22.1 ± 19.3°, p = 0.007). The mean wear rate was 0.0044 mm/year for the 28-mm CoC and 0.0044 mm/year for the 32-mm CoC. No ceramic fractures were found in the 2 groups. One joint in the 28-mm CoC (0.9%) required revision owing to progressive osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years, with implant loosening or revision THA as the endpoint, was 98.3% for 28-mm CoC and 100% for 32-mm CoC ( p = 0.465).

CONCLUSION

: There was no significant difference in ceramic-related complications between the 2 groups. Our study demonstrated that the 32-mm and 28-mm CoC are safe and are associated with good clinical outcomes.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较28毫米陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)全髋关节置换术(THA)与32毫米CoC全髋关节置换术在5至15年随访期内的临床和影像学结果。

方法

107个关节(95名女性和6名男性)接受了28毫米CoC全髋关节置换术,60个关节(49名女性和7名男性)接受了32毫米CoC全髋关节置换术。28毫米和32毫米CoC组患者手术时的平均年龄分别为56.1岁和55.7岁。对所有患者进行了临床和放射学测量分析。

结果

两组术前Harris髋关节评分(HHS)均值相似(28毫米组为58.9,32毫米组为58.5)。然而,在最终随访时,32毫米CoC组的平均HHS(91.8)显著优于28毫米CoC组(88.2)(p = 0.003),屈伸活动范围(ROM)(98.3±13.5°对87.3±19.3°,p < 0.001)和外展活动范围(27.8±14.9°对22.1±19.3°,p = 0.007)也是如此。28毫米CoC的平均磨损率为每年0.0044毫米,32毫米CoC的平均磨损率为每年0.0044毫米。两组均未发现陶瓷骨折。28毫米CoC组有1个关节(0.9%)因进行性骨溶解需要翻修。以植入物松动或翻修THA为终点,28毫米CoC在10年时的Kaplan-Meier生存率为98.3%,32毫米CoC为100%(p = 0.465)。

结论

两组之间与陶瓷相关的并发症无显著差异。我们的研究表明,32毫米和28毫米CoC是安全的,且临床效果良好。

相似文献

1
32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study.32毫米陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术与28毫米陶瓷轴承:5至15年随访研究
Hip Int. 2019 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1177/1120700018760971. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up.金属对超高交联聚乙烯与陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后生存率的比较:5-9 年随访的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):663-669. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
5
Ceramic-Ceramic Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis: Average 5-year Follow-up in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age.用于治疗骨坏死的陶瓷-陶瓷髋关节置换术:对年龄小于50岁患者的平均5年随访
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Mar;73(1):42-5.
6
Midterm outcome of fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中第四代陶瓷对陶瓷轴承表面的中期结果。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018783913. doi: 10.1177/2309499018783913.
7
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
8
Ceramic-on-Ceramic in Total Hip Replacement Revision.全髋关节置换翻修术中的陶瓷对陶瓷
Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Jun;156(3):272-280. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124767. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
10
Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is superior to metal-on-conventional polyethylene at 20-year follow-up: A randomised clinical trial.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术优于金属对传统聚乙烯在 20 年随访:一项随机临床试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102744. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102744. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching.通过倾向得分匹配比较第四代36毫米股骨头与第三代28毫米股骨头的陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的结果。
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Sep 2;54(6):848-855. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00242-z. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Third generation delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearing for total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up.全髋关节置换术中使用的第三代陶瓷对陶瓷Delta轴承的中期随访
J Orthop. 2020 Aug 28;22:397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.023. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.