Curtis Pamela, Taylor Gordon, Harris Michael
a Department for Health , University of Bath , Bath , UK.
Educ Prim Care. 2018 Jul;29(4):222-227. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2018.1461027. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
Background The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaire assesses whether learners prefer a deep, strategic or surface approach to learning. This study aimed to establish the effect of time since qualification, gender and work role on ASSIST scores of General Practitioners (GPs) and GP Specialist Trainees (GPSTs). Methods An anonymous online questionnaire with demographic questions and the ASSIST survey was completed by 1005 GPs and GPSTs from across the United Kingdom. Results Of the 544 GPs and 461 GPSTs completing the survey, 96.5% preferred a deep and/or strategic approach to learning. There was a significant increase in the preference for a deep approach with time from graduation and significantly less preference for a surface approach. There was no significant change in any of the scores over the GPST years. Men had significantly higher scores for a deep approach than women. Conclusions GPs and GPSTs prefer deep and strategic approaches to a surface approach. While higher levels of GP experience are associated with a higher deep approach score and a lower surface approach score, this change is not seen during progression through GP training. Men have higher scores for a deep approach than women.
背景 学生学习方法与技能量表(ASSIST)问卷用于评估学习者倾向于采用深度学习、策略性学习还是表面学习方法。本研究旨在确定资格获取时间、性别和工作角色对全科医生(GP)和全科医生专科培训学员(GPST)的ASSIST分数的影响。方法 来自英国各地的1005名全科医生和全科医生专科培训学员完成了一份包含人口统计学问题和ASSIST调查的匿名在线问卷。结果 在完成调查的544名全科医生和461名全科医生专科培训学员中,96.5%的人倾向于采用深度学习和/或策略性学习方法。随着毕业时间的推移,对深度学习方法的偏好显著增加,而对表面学习方法的偏好显著降低。在全科医生专科培训学员的几年中,任何分数均无显著变化。男性在深度学习方法上的得分显著高于女性。结论 全科医生和全科医生专科培训学员更喜欢深度学习和策略性学习方法,而不是表面学习方法。虽然全科医生经验水平越高,深度学习方法得分越高,表面学习方法得分越低,但在全科医生培训过程中并未出现这种变化。男性在深度学习方法上的得分高于女性。