IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 May;65(5):1140-1150. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2777742.
During an interactive image segmentation task, the outcome is strongly influenced by human factors. In particular, a reduction in computation time does not guarantee an improvement in the overall segmentation time. This paper characterizes user efficiency during scribble-based interactive segmentation as a function of computation time.
We report a controlled experiment with users who experienced eight different levels of simulated latency (ranging from 100 to 2000 ms) with two techniques for refreshing visual feedback (either automatic, where the segmentation was recomputed and displayed continuously during label drawing, or user initiated, which was only computed and displayed each time the user hits a defined button).
For short latencies, the user's attention is focused on the automatic visual feedback, slowing down his/her labeling performance. This effect is attenuated as the latency grows larger, and the two refresh techniques yield similar user performance at the largest latencies. Moreover, during the segmentation task, participants spent in average for automatic refresh and for user-initiated refresh of the overall segmentation time interpreting the results.
The latency is perceived differently according to the refresh method used during the segmentation task. Therefore, it is possible to reduce its impact on the user performance.
This is the first time a study investigates the effects of latency in an interactive segmentation task. The analysis and recommendations provided in this paper help understanding the cognitive mechanisms in interactive image segmentation.
在交互式图像分割任务中,结果受到人为因素的强烈影响。特别是,减少计算时间并不保证整体分割时间的改善。本文将用户在基于涂鸦的交互式分割中的效率特征描述为计算时间的函数。
我们报告了一项受控实验,其中用户体验了两种视觉反馈刷新技术(自动,其中在绘制标签时连续重新计算和显示分割,或用户发起,仅在用户点击定义的按钮时计算和显示)的八种不同模拟延迟水平(从 100 到 2000 毫秒)。
对于短延迟,用户的注意力集中在自动视觉反馈上,从而降低了其标记性能。随着延迟的增加,这种影响会减弱,并且在最大延迟时,两种刷新技术产生相似的用户性能。此外,在分割任务期间,参与者平均花费自动刷新和用户发起刷新的时间来解释结果。
根据分割任务中使用的刷新方法,用户对延迟的感知不同。因此,有可能降低其对用户性能的影响。
这是首次研究在交互式分割任务中延迟的影响。本文提供的分析和建议有助于理解交互式图像分割中的认知机制。