Kinoshita Sachiko, Schubert Teresa, Verdonschot Rinus G
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University.
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):183-190. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
It is well-established that allographs like the uppercase and lowercase forms of the Roman alphabet (e.g., a and A) map onto the same "abstract letter identity," orthographic representations that are independent of the visual form. Consistent with this, in the allograph match task ("Are 'a' and 'A' the same letter?"), priming by a masked letter prime is equally robust for visually dissimilar prime-target pairs (e.g., d and D) and similar pairs (e.g., c and C). However, in principle this pattern of priming is also consistent with the possibility that allograph priming is purely phonological, based on the letter name. Because different allographic forms of the same letter, by definition, share a letter name, it is impossible to rule out this possibility a priori. In the present study, we investigated the influence of shared letter names by taking advantage of the fact that Japanese is written in two distinct writing systems, syllabic kana-that has two parallel forms, hiragana and katakana-and logographic kanji. Using the allograph match task, we tested whether a kanji prime with the same pronunciation as the target kana (e.g., - い, both pronounced /i/) produces the same amount of priming as a kana prime in the opposite kana form (e.g., イ- い). We found that the kana primes produced substantially greater priming than the phonologically identical kanji prime, which we take as evidence that allograph priming is based on abstract kana identity, not purely phonology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
众所周知,像罗马字母的大写和小写形式(如a和A)这样的书写变体映射到相同的“抽象字母身份”,即与视觉形式无关的正字法表征。与此一致的是,在书写变体匹配任务(“‘a’和‘A’是同一个字母吗?”)中,对于视觉上不同的启动-目标对(如d和D)和相似的对(如c和C),由一个掩蔽字母启动所产生的启动效应同样强烈。然而,原则上这种启动模式也与书写变体启动纯粹基于字母名称的语音学这一可能性相一致。因为根据定义,同一个字母的不同书写变体形式共享一个字母名称,所以无法先验地排除这种可能性。在本研究中,我们利用了日语用两种不同书写系统书写这一事实来研究共享字母名称的影响,这两种系统是音节假名——有两种平行形式,平假名和片假名——以及表意汉字。使用书写变体匹配任务,我们测试了与目标假名发音相同的汉字启动(如-い,两者都发音为/i/)是否会产生与相反假名形式的假名启动(如イ-い)相同程度的启动效应。我们发现,假名启动产生的启动效应比语音学上相同的汉字启动大得多,我们将此作为书写变体启动基于抽象假名身份而非纯粹语音学的证据。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)