Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195237. eCollection 2018.
The present research explored whether components of social identity, namely ingroup ties, affect, and centrality, were differentially linked to mental health and inflammatory immune responses, and whether rumination mediated those relations. Study 1 (N = 138) indicated that stronger ingroup ties were associated with fewer mental health (depressive and post-traumatic stress) symptoms; those relations were mediated by the tendency for individuals with strong ties to rely less on ruminative coping to deal with a stressful life event. Study 2 (N = 54) demonstrated that ingroup ties were negatively associated with depressive symptoms, dispositional rumination, as well as stress-linked inflammatory elements at the physiological level. Consistent associations for centrality and ingroup affect were absent, suggesting that ingroup ties may have unique health benefits.
本研究旨在探讨社会认同的组成部分,即内群体联系、情感和中心性,是否与心理健康和炎症免疫反应有不同的关联,以及反刍是否在这些关系中起中介作用。研究 1(N=138)表明,较强的内群体联系与较少的心理健康(抑郁和创伤后应激)症状有关;这些关系是由具有较强联系的个体更倾向于不依赖于反刍应对来应对生活压力事件的趋势所介导的。研究 2(N=54)表明,内群体联系与抑郁症状、倾向于反刍以及生理水平上与压力相关的炎症因素呈负相关。中心性和内群体情感的一致关联并不存在,这表明内群体联系可能具有独特的健康益处。