Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
School of Psychology, Coventry University, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 15;309:274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.142. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Disruption to everyday routine during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in considerable implications for global mental health. The inter- and intra-personal mechanisms by which disrupted routine can contribute to elevated depressive symptoms has not been well-explored. The present study aimed to examine how feelings of social (dis)connectedness and rumination, as a maladaptive coping strategy, could explain the association between disrupted well-being activities and depressive symptoms.
Participants (N = 496) ranging in age from 18 to 73 years (M = 28.73, SD = 10.93) completed an online survey within the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, which included measures of disruption to usual psychological and physical well-being activities, social connectedness, rumination, and depressive symptoms. Social connectedness and rumination were investigated as serial mediators of the association between disrupted well-being activities and depression using Hayes' PROCESS macro.
39.5% of the sample reported clinically significant levels of depression. Disruption to well-being activities predicted higher depressive symptoms, and this was partially explained by feelings of social disconnectedness and subsequent rumination. Rumination, alone, was not a significant mediator between disrupted routine and depressive symptoms.
The cross-sectional survey design does not preclude the possibility of bidirectional effects.
The social distancing public health measures to combat COVID-19 have contributed to widespread disrupted routine, and in turn, elevated symptoms of depression. Social disconnectedness plays a particularly important role in this association. Intervention strategies should consider social factors as a 'social cure' for mass, positive mental health promotion during COVID-19.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,日常生活的中断对全球心理健康产生了重大影响。日常生活中断如何通过人际和个体机制导致抑郁症状升高,这一点尚未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨社会(脱节)连接感和反刍(一种适应不良的应对策略)如何解释幸福感活动中断与抑郁症状之间的关联。
年龄在 18 至 73 岁之间的参与者(N=496)(M=28.73,SD=10.93)在 COVID-19 大流行的头 3 个月内完成了一项在线调查,其中包括对日常心理和身体健康活动、社会联系、反刍和抑郁症状的中断的测量。使用 Hayes 的 PROCESS 宏研究了社会联系和反刍在幸福感活动中断与抑郁之间的关联中的序列中介作用。
样本中有 39.5%的人报告了临床显著水平的抑郁。幸福感活动的中断预测了更高的抑郁症状,这部分是由社会脱节感和随后的反刍解释的。反刍本身并不是幸福感活动中断和抑郁症状之间的显著中介因素。
横断面调查设计不能排除双向效应的可能性。
为抗击 COVID-19 而采取的社交距离公共卫生措施导致了广泛的日常生活中断,进而导致了抑郁症状的升高。社会脱节在这种关联中起着特别重要的作用。干预策略应将社会因素视为 COVID-19 期间促进大众积极心理健康的“社会疗法”。