Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Health Promotion, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;145:200-213. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
Health behaviour change interventions have potential to reduce diabetes after pregnancy (DAP) rates following gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Recruitment success is arguably as important as intervention effectiveness, but receives less attention. We examined penetration into target populations and participation in DAP prevention interventions in women with a GDM history.
Five databases were searched for studies published up to December 2017. Studies were reviewed by at least three reviewers and data were qualitatively synthesized. Penetration (invited/target population) and participation (enrolled/invited) rates were calculated after data extraction.
Among 2859 records, 33 intervention studies were identified, among which 16 had sufficient information to calculate penetration or participation. Penetration proportion (n = 9 studies) was between 85 and 100% for two-thirds of studies included. Participation proportion (n = 16 studies) varied substantially; when recruitment occurred during pregnancy or early postpartum, participation was 40% or more, especially if face-to-face contact was used within the GDM care setting, compared to under 15% in mid/late postpartum with mailed invitation and/or telephone contact.
Although penetration and participation reporting is sub-optimal, penetration is generally high while participation is variable. Leveraging and structuring recruitment within standard GDM care and settings appears to be important to engage women in DAP prevention activities.
健康行为改变干预措施有可能降低妊娠糖尿病(GDM)后糖尿病(DAP)的发生率。招募的成功可以说与干预效果同样重要,但却较少受到关注。我们研究了有 GDM 病史的女性对 DAP 预防干预措施的目标人群的参与率和参与度。
我们在五个数据库中搜索了截至 2017 年 12 月发表的研究。研究由至少三名评审员进行评审,数据进行定性综合分析。在数据提取后计算了渗透(受邀/目标人群)和参与(登记/受邀)的比例。
在 2859 条记录中,确定了 33 项干预研究,其中 16 项研究有足够的信息来计算渗透或参与率。三分之二的研究中有三分之二的研究的渗透比例(n=9 项研究)在 85%至 100%之间。参与比例(n=16 项研究)差异很大;如果在妊娠或产后早期进行招募,参与率在 40%或以上,特别是如果在 GDM 护理环境中使用面对面接触,而在产后中期/晚期通过邮寄邀请和/或电话联系的参与率则低于 15%。
尽管渗透和参与报告不尽如人意,但渗透总体较高,而参与率则存在差异。在标准的 GDM 护理和环境中利用和构建招募机制,对于使妇女参与 DAP 预防活动很重要。