• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化二线治疗的疗效分析。

Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):777-785. doi: 10.1177/1352458518768433. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/1352458518768433
PMID:29685071
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No randomized controlled trials have compared the efficacy of fingolimod or natalizumab as second-line treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes after escalation to fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with clinically active RRMS.

METHODS

Using the registry of the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances, we identified patients with RRMS and ≥1 relapse in the year before switching from interferon beta or glatiramer acetate to fingolimod or natalizumab. Propensity score matching was used to select patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 547 included patients, 358 were matched (fingolimod, n = 179; natalizumab, n = 179). Median follow-up time was 1.8 years (interquartile range 0.9-2.9). Patients switching to natalizumab had a lower risk of relapses (incidence rate ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8, p = 0.001) and were more likely to experience EDSS improvement (hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.7, p = 0.01) compared to fingolimod. We found no differences in the proportion of patients free from EDSS progression (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.5, p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Natalizumab seems to be more effective in reducing relapse rate and improving disability compared with fingolimod.

摘要

背景

尚无随机对照试验比较那他珠单抗或芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化(RRMS)二线治疗的疗效。

目的

比较临床活动型 RRMS 患者升级为芬戈莫德或那他珠单抗后的临床结局。

方法

利用瑞士联邦医疗保险共同任务登记处,我们鉴定了在从干扰素β或那他珠单抗转换为芬戈莫德或那他珠单抗前 1 年有≥1 次复发的 RRMS 患者。采用倾向评分匹配选择基线特征可比的患者。在配对、成对删失分析中比较了复发和扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)结局。

结果

547 例纳入患者中,358 例匹配(芬戈莫德组,n = 179;那他珠单抗组,n = 179)。中位随访时间为 1.8 年(四分位间距 0.9-2.9)。转换用那他珠单抗的患者复发风险较低(发病率比 0.5,95%置信区间 0.3-0.8,p = 0.001),且更可能出现 EDSS 改善(风险比 1.8,95%置信区间 1.1-2.7,p = 0.01)。我们未发现两组无 EDSS 进展患者的比例有差异(风险比 0.9,95%置信区间 0.5-1.5,p = 0.62)。

结论

与芬戈莫德相比,那他珠单抗似乎能更有效地降低复发率和改善残疾。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化二线治疗的疗效分析。
Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):777-785. doi: 10.1177/1352458518768433. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.那他利珠单抗停药后,芬戈莫德对比干扰素β/那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的疗效。
Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3275-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv260. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗一线注射治疗应答不佳的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650736. Epub 2016 May 26.
4
Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Subgroup Analysis From Three International Cohorts.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者:来自三个国际队列的亚组分析。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Nov;35(11):1217-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00860-7. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
5
Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和干扰素β相比,阿仑单抗的治疗效果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Apr;16(4):271-281. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30007-8. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
6
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.在英国,对比那珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗快速进展性重度复发缓解型多发性硬化的疗效和成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):109-125. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2293379. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):2121-2129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
8
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3.
9
Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.在活跃复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,转换为那他珠单抗或芬戈莫德。
Ann Neurol. 2015 Mar;77(3):425-35. doi: 10.1002/ana.24339. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis After the Failure of First-Line Therapy: Single Center Experience Based on the Treatment of Forty-Four Patients.一线治疗失败后芬戈莫德和那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的安全性和有效性:基于44例患者治疗的单中心经验
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Nov 10;22:4277-4282. doi: 10.12659/msm.898270.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary progression activity monitoring in MS despite an early highly active treatment the SPAM study.尽管早期进行了高度积极的治疗,但在多发性硬化症中进行继发性进展活动监测:SPAM研究
Eur J Neurol. 2025 May;32(5):e16583. doi: 10.1111/ene.16583.
2
Personalized Use of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症中疾病修饰疗法的个性化应用
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):120. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010120.
3
Handling related publications reporting real-world evidence in network meta-analysis: a case study in multiple sclerosis.
处理网络荟萃分析中真实世界证据相关出版物:多发性硬化症的案例研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Aug;12(8):e220132. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0132. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
4
Achieving no evidence of disease activity-3 in highly active multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine and monoclonal antibodies.在用克拉屈滨和单克隆抗体治疗的高度活动性多发性硬化症患者中实现疾病活动-3无证据状态
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023 Feb 22;9(1):20552173231154712. doi: 10.1177/20552173231154712. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
5
The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):2121-2129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Impact of methodological choices in comparative effectiveness studies: application in natalizumab versus fingolimod comparison among patients with multiple sclerosis.方法学选择对比较有效性研究的影响:在多发性硬化症患者中比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 30;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01623-8.
7
Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Following Cessation of Fingolimod.停药后多发性硬化症的复发。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Apr;42(4):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01129-7. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Neurological update: treatment escalation in multiple sclerosis patients refractory to fingolimod-potentials and risks of subsequent highly active agents.神经科最新进展:对接受芬戈莫德治疗抵抗的多发性硬化患者进行治疗升级——后续使用高活性药物的潜力和风险。
J Neurol. 2022 May;269(5):2806-2818. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10956-1. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
9
Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis and subsequent health service use.多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物和后续的医疗服务利用。
Mult Scler. 2022 Apr;28(4):583-596. doi: 10.1177/13524585211063403. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Patients with Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.在英国,对于疾病修饰疗法应答不足的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德的疗效和成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Mar;40(3):323-339. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01106-6. Epub 2021 Dec 18.