• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized trials and evidence in medicine: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.

作者信息

Concato John, Horwitz Ralph I

机构信息

Director, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, and Professor of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA.

Professor of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, 3500 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.010
PMID:29685451
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized trials and evidence in medicine: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.医学中的随机试验与证据：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Challenging the hegemony of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.挑战随机对照试验的霸权：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验的益处与局限：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:48-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Randomized clinical trials and personalized medicine: A commentary on deaton and cartwright.随机临床试验和个性化医学：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:71-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.理解与误解随机对照试验：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
6
Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验：常常存在缺陷，大多毫无用处，但显然不可或缺：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
The tribulations of trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.试验的磨难：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:57-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Mechanisms and uncertainty in randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验中的机制与不确定性：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:83-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Randomization, randomized trials, and analyses using observational data: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机化、随机试验以及使用观察性数据的分析：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Evidence, policy and politics: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:45-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
From Efficacy to Effectiveness: Evaluating Psychedelic Randomized Controlled Trials for Trustworthy Evidence-Based Policy and Practice.从疗效到效果：评估迷幻药随机对照试验以获取可靠的循证政策与实践依据
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Apr;13(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70097.
2
Need for a nutrition-specific scientific paradigm for research quality improvement.需要一种针对营养的科学范式以提高研究质量。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2023 Jul 14;6(2):383-391. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000650. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the properties of patient-specific treatment effect estimates from causal forest algorithms under essential heterogeneity.
评估因果森林算法在本质异质性下对特定于患者的治疗效果估计的特性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02187-5.
4
Assessing the ability of an instrumental variable causal forest algorithm to personalize treatment evidence using observational data: the case of early surgery for shoulder fracture.评估工具变量因果森林算法利用观察数据进行个体化治疗证据的能力：以肩部骨折早期手术为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01663-0.
5
Ranking evidence in substance use and addiction.物质使用与成瘾方面的证据分级
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102840. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102840. Epub 2020 Jul 6.