• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mechanisms and uncertainty in randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.

作者信息

Suzuki Etsuji, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:83-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.023
PMID:29703448
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Mechanisms and uncertainty in randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验中的机制与不确定性：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:83-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
2
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.理解与误解随机对照试验：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
3
Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验：常常存在缺陷，大多毫无用处，但显然不可或缺：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant "gold standard" status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.如果单随机分配实验要获得“金标准”地位必须满足的26个假设：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
5
Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验的益处与局限：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:48-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
Challenging the hegemony of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.挑战随机对照试验的霸权：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Randomization, randomized trials, and analyses using observational data: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机化、随机试验以及使用观察性数据的分析：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
The tribulations of trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.试验的磨难：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:57-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
Randomized trials and evidence in medicine: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.医学中的随机试验与证据：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
10
On randomized experimentation in education: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright, in honor of Frederick Mosteller.论教育中的随机试验：纪念弗雷德里克·莫斯特勒，对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling Causality: Innovations in Epidemiologic Methods.揭示因果关系：流行病学方法的创新
JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):323-337. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0246. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Strength in causality: discerning causal mechanisms in the sufficient cause model.因果关系的力量：在充分原因模型中辨别因果机制。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):899-908. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00798-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
3
Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.因果图：陷阱与技巧。
J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 5;30(4):153-162. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190192. Epub 2020 Feb 1.